From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Weiner Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] mm/memcg: Separate out object stock data into its own struct Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:57:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20210414012027.5352-1-longman@redhat.com> <20210414012027.5352-5-longman@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cmpxchg-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=8CoVbt6IzeLUC5q7IpdX1He4bycqg82PFofNsjY3nlo=; b=dz805Z+hx47wOwNMrHi3cTS4DU3UR/WoK/LOkLO4wjGFRvU0R2UR/LM1Jr5qmO+UfX Xj8eZgLigKlOmHDihOrF/lge4KjH4S1MbzQ1M0phjbomNKF4n6kf/MMrGg1Ou+v4T6oN hKy0W1m35ceAeVYDrHWoHULB41E5JJZzzI3D2kUw76zXNtQ3bamQFVNjksr5O8mNKpMf 4W4khLTCWvVPTlyDZi5xBNYSSFRlRicGN+SQevM04Aa6pNLQ7jNhYYrcky177RipPj2F 3TdlR6C9GSq2z9Q4NoV8m/FUwzOffvwttLpLK7cohfEQM759tvqvn+nzZANak8XsuIDd EQrQ== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210414012027.5352-5-longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Waiman Long Cc: Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Vlastimil Babka , Roman Gushchin , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Shakeel Butt , Muchun Song , Alex Shi , Chris Down , Yafang Shao , Wei Yang , Masayoshi Mizuma , Xing Zhengjun On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:20:26PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > The object stock data stored in struct memcg_stock_pcp are independent > of the other page based data stored there. Separating them out into > their own struct to highlight the independency. > > Signed-off-by: Waiman Long > Acked-by: Roman Gushchin > Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt > --- > mm/memcontrol.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) It's almost twice more code, and IMO not any clearer. Plus it adds some warts: int dummy[0], redundant naming in stock->obj.cached_objcg, this_cpu_ptr() doesn't really need a wrapper etc.