From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: Add configuration to control whether vmpressure
 notifier is enabled
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 08:37:04 +0200
Message-ID: <YTW3EMKU7fLl62bC@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <1629417219-74853-1-git-send-email-wang.yong12@zte.com.cn>
 <YR+Rc9HC6OqlEq4I@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CAOH5QeCfwF0hX3XpoThEtwnddtOFEU9Jtp0Hoj+Q37D4Q6HC0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <YR/NRJEhPKRQ1r22@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CAOH5QeDUUqrMnuws6cnBDU_oub4cK6KsHeX39p7Eikr4Bcjcnw@mail.gmail.com>
 <YSzh31BasoxUQXAu@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CAOH5QeBrxpddmTL40ryajjCJZ4WHJsaubYKBvaeikikn1JmJ9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1;
        t=1630910225; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:
         mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
         in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
        bh=C18ucwuH+xJ590fcQPWTQo1wKpR5pILZsUHhaeFFJM8=;
        b=NQJNxXbGll03ANbTcVcmNA5GRE1HmZ8q8Gkbt8sMek82fcvVlXMxFNq8skistKpgpjAyFl
        ptCsa57t0u4Izkcuk8A6SGw5VPSP6VR/Cdm6uuxiUnB8PZPvFHFElwZASWjuaWujvQGPD0
        XbzzL0owuRWs7ezDAcoUrEO7IcyHWK8=
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOH5QeBrxpddmTL40ryajjCJZ4WHJsaubYKBvaeikikn1JmJ9Q@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <cgroups.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: yong w <yongw.pur@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, alexs@kernel.org, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>, Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, wang.yong12@zte.com.cn, Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn

On Sat 04-09-21 18:41:00, yong w wrote:
[..]
> > It is not in conflict but runtime overhead reduction without more burden
> > on the configurability is usually a preferred approach.
> I agree with you.I had an idea that we use global variables to identify whether
> there is event registration,however, global variables need to be
> protected with locks.

Have a look at static keys which are usual tool to provide effectivelly
zero overhead disabled branch.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs