From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH memcg 0/1] false global OOM triggered by memcg-limited task Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 18:51:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: <9d10df01-0127-fb40-81c3-cc53c9733c3e@virtuozzo.com> <6b751abe-aa52-d1d8-2631-ec471975cc3a@virtuozzo.com> <27dc0c49-a0d6-875b-49c6-0ef5c0cc3ac8@virtuozzo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1634575885; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6d1q+ubZusaXumuE3riMUHm2jTbTP959W22zG60KItg=; b=fKu+qOYXhZzEp+4Webr7Gz5rjCvBK4A8tlusIDpeSd3E8XdtJaNxr8PAFbK6W9yO+rJ8pN oVQLPo5TxdQHL4pK+LLbCl4u0Z1E4/d/0cwHIYBJh+eMmFEbE4ldAJ0nwZHCPEYUZBx6J/ E8Tohc07y3OCyC2sRGMX3CMeUir1HFw= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Shakeel Butt Cc: Vasily Averin , Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , Roman Gushchin , Uladzislau Rezki , Vlastimil Babka , Mel Gorman , Cgroups , Linux MM , LKML , kernel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org On Mon 18-10-21 08:07:20, Shakeel Butt wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 5:27 AM Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > [restore the cc list] > > > > On Mon 18-10-21 15:14:26, Vasily Averin wrote: > > > On 18.10.2021 14:53, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Mon 18-10-21 13:05:35, Vasily Averin wrote: > > > >> On 18.10.2021 12:04, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > >> Here we call try_charge_memcg() that return success and approve the allocation, > > > >> however then we hit into kmem limit and fail the allocation. > > > > > > > > Just to make sure I understand this would be for the v1 kmem explicit > > > > limit, correct? > > > > > > yes, I mean this limit. > > > > OK, thanks for the clarification. This is a known problem. Have a look > > at I think we consider that one to 0158115f702b ("memcg, kmem: deprecate > > kmem.limit_in_bytes"). We are reporting the deprecated and to-be removed > > status since 2019 without any actual report sugested by the kernel > > message. Maybe we should try and remove it and see whether that prompts > > some pushback. > > > > Yes, I think now should be the right time to take the next step for > deprecation of kmem limits: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20201118175726.2453120-1-shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org/ I completely forgot about your patch. Anyway, it usually takes us years to deprecate something so let's stick with it and consider 2 years as years ;) -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs