Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm/memcg: Allow the task_obj optimization only on non-PREEMPTIBLE kernels.

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>]

On 2021-12-23 16:48:41 [-0500], Waiman Long wrote:
> On 12/22/21 06:41, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Based on my understanding the optimisation with task_obj for in_task()
> > mask sense on non-PREEMPTIBLE kernels because preempt_disable()/enable()
> > is optimized away. This could be then restricted to !CONFIG_PREEMPTION kernel
> > instead to only PREEMPT_RT.
> > With CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC a non-PREEMPTIBLE kernel can also be
> > configured but these kernels always have preempt_disable()/enable()
> > present so it probably makes no sense here for the optimisation.
> > 
> > Restrict the optimisation to !CONFIG_PREEMPTION kernels.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
> 
> If PREEMPT_DYNAMIC is selected, PREEMPTION will also be set. My
> understanding is that some distros are going to use PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, but
> default to PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY. So I don't believe it is a good idea to
> disable the optimization based on PREEMPTION alone.

So there is a benefit to this even if preempt_disable() is not optimized
away? My understanding was that this depends on preempt_disable() being
optimized away.
Is there something you recommend as a benchmark where I could get some
numbers?

> Regards,
> Longman

Sebastian