From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Gushchin Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: support control THP behaviour in cgroup Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 20:11:16 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20220505033814.103256-1-xu.xin16@zte.com.cn> <6275d3e7.1c69fb81.1d62.4504@mx.google.com> <6278fa75.1c69fb81.9c598.f794@mx.google.com> <6279c354.1c69fb81.7f6c1.15e0@mx.google.com> <627b1d39.1c69fb81.fe952.6426@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1652238682; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8UHed0uiQg7plMIS+d8Hr/ojdF24QkSbiog6M6TLs1U=; b=gnnizCg1quxOzlHtzeLqGl0Sze8T7KWis2CGpHRM6kBbVTfG4LZYN8pexQWnSjQ5FP8acs PYMS/zpRaeE4pP/ZWDRExv0v1tbxT+qGew/WOAapbTGo/H4cqYJPy8VIUFMJAGJRe32XWn zM0jfZ40CAm485b9ybWd/ObltE7aI4U= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Shakeel Butt Cc: CGEL , Yang Shi , Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Matthew Wilcox , Miaohe Lin , William Kucharski , Peter Xu , Hugh Dickins , Vlastimil Babka , Muchun Song , Suren Baghdasaryan , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux MM , Cgroups , Yang Yang On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 07:47:29PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 7:19 PM CGEL wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > All controls in cgroup v2 should be hierarchical. This is really > > > > > required for a proper delegation semantic. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could we align to the semantic of /sys/fs/cgroup/memory.swappiness? > > > > Some distributions like Ubuntu is still using cgroup v1. > > > > > > Other than enable flag, how would you handle the defrag flag > > > hierarchically? It is much more complicated. > > > > Refer to memory.swappiness for cgroup, this new interface better be independent. > > Let me give my 0.02. I buy the use-case of Admin restricting THPs to > low priority jobs but I don't think memory controller is the right > place to enforce that policy. Michal gave one way (prctl()) to enforce > that policy. Have you explored the BPF way to enforce this policy? +1 for bpf I think these THP hints are too implementation-dependent and unstable to become a part of cgroup API. Thanks!