From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] sched: Provide copy_user_cpus_mask() to copy out user mask Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:58:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20220812203929.364341-1-longman@redhat.com> <20220812203929.364341-3-longman@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=X1Kk26FPg2jYHPvOS2s86o6tg2NoWayeOGSNjQIPE58=; b=rrsHTcvocEIu0njvXEnAoUncHw AS8nABWuqLfAfD9VJMaEUGdsPEJ6kYvuCMWpfsWtcOVdcgS0yDq2so/auNex1lo3b1l6EBiz2H7h5 NRkFPzXHaXQvqlbKU5ttS02AFmeez9M8vGC1NNAV0wFw0S4T3yJdCPkBjDsW2KQfslXbjE/NEqssj f9cq4h6K4C70MeFyHRLsAX+QmnXpXTHZi7RP1qjvmoqokKDoIZbCmo/IK3DvgtjQ0IK5zuO60R3rS 7U9oklNwG/wZSAIno6+HiHbYyQZ1M8VkmMjRq/p84b3nPW99Z97XtmaKhTucauSBDxImFJUpG0LrD VM5HOJpA==; Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220812203929.364341-3-longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Waiman Long Cc: Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Valentin Schneider , Tejun Heo , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Will Deacon , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linus Torvalds On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 04:39:28PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > Since accessing the content of the user_cpus_ptr requires lock protection > to ensure its validity, provide a helper function copy_user_cpus_mask() > to facilitate its reading. Sure, but this is atrocious. > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -2619,6 +2619,24 @@ void release_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p) > kfree(clear_user_cpus_ptr(p)); > } > > +/* > + * Return the copied mask pointer or NULL if user mask not available. > + */ > +struct cpumask *copy_user_cpus_mask(struct task_struct *p, > + struct cpumask *user_mask) > +{ > + struct rq_flags rf; > + struct rq *rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf); > + struct cpumask *mask = NULL; > + > + if (p->user_cpus_ptr) { > + cpumask_copy(user_mask, p->user_cpus_ptr); > + mask = user_mask; > + } > + task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); > + return mask; > +} For reading the mask you only need one of those locks, and I would suggest p->pi_lock is much less contended than rq->lock.