From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/20] x86/sgx: Call cond_resched() at the end of sgx_reclaim_pages() Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:32:40 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20220922171057.1236139-1-kristen@linux.intel.com> <20220922171057.1236139-2-kristen@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1663936364; bh=Fev/xAbFy6dCF9ucIYtx19kMsRsV2B9GzILLEMxl7KU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=i8VrLusZ5uePvQXxY5Mcd7BGi1YUArVfDQPr1NkwhErQ0EigpIyVeNCaC68a2fuxI dcPh5rTB8eooSjAoj0sQvmq6Y10oempGoRFrFXZJDPcPCIQvbIggRJS+16m0upMLdD /J9yLiwnUENhZ8NoRmXgZ9Ann7bcrOjt4O6+Qi8U/gj4IgGqmzWqpMTbUOAz6Myx/P 666EfrDI/guIroOhYeWlaxz1Vbvy0ZgvKxc1zvlJV7Fm+bGmx6H+e3t/eRPv0gdZ0z RwXkofn7VRGdJpGtwKU6sCGr2zyYf6m8P+SSnTyDnbZSf22aIQk8gGNKBcDGXpKQRC n1wa9E/VBs53w== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220922171057.1236139-2-kristen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Kristen Carlson Accardi Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sgx-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Sean Christopherson On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:10:38AM -0700, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > From: Sean Christopherson > > Move the invocation of post-reclaim cond_resched() from the callers of > sgx_reclaim_pages() into the reclaim path itself. sgx_reclaim_pages() > is always called in a loop and is always followed by a call to > cond_resched(). This will hold true for the EPC cgroup as well, which > adds even more calls to sgx_reclaim_pages() and thus cond_resched(). This would be in my opinion better: " In order to avoid repetion of cond_sched() in ksgxd() and sgx_alloc_epc_page(), move the call inside sgx_reclaim_pages(). This will hold true for the EPC cgroup as well, which adds more call sites sgx_reclaim_pages(). " This way it is dead obvious and is better description because it enumerates the consequences (i.e. call sites). BR, Jarkko