From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 210D014D283 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 08:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741337614; cv=none; b=ZhXJNFFnH4ePtHKWSeef2p/ovmJALp7FDMB5lz9tn4qd6dgcKzoVTkSov3JJFwGAnU42a3wruK/pY8x2Qs1d8IgY17WOvAELqwkMq1/b85cChPphcqmkLJojC3FuwkF/xKS3boTqwSyu+Wf2lv0FiC6BZlabUHHP3PvUkXkYZJM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741337614; c=relaxed/simple; bh=trVq+/QuImX7PggLWSPIN3coPhqb1R9Aue9P2NTVfo4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HRyFYjj+n4CcnaEKhIqoWmlY8cnIrZ+fG34CuRWyAQrxnMn0kmkbPE0atLMh7jo0xEyULrO0tkkaTDisRYw1zB0VOWyGvdSn8ad00QaNwPNN7lCcmdOmx8PftKiWH0uLoiPVF6g/be+RGyvJS6QugdVJ/tcvXVE15vGoetLjFDM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Tr5okCe6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Tr5okCe6" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1741337611; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dLCvL7MTjAjZGB5lfv9MT1kgTWiIaHT/S9+g0TItFt8=; b=Tr5okCe6CCdb6Dw3yPZG0oEYJANgk6axbaqlGzpSCSB7PF6dUYS9NcgvcfSK0hMtJ5RhIT 7sFVX94ePzYG2LBuKMOVrx5zFEao744ANJxqrWSltwXr25ZkulTrpQT5lEtf4hVYgzUkT1 fu9PG6rRyLd0QFeCmf3fR8B7fy2W5dw= Received: from mail-qk1-f200.google.com (mail-qk1-f200.google.com [209.85.222.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-595-6OHHyL9eP-OPfPRZlRjCUw-1; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 03:53:29 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 6OHHyL9eP-OPfPRZlRjCUw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 6OHHyL9eP-OPfPRZlRjCUw_1741337609 Received: by mail-qk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7c24bb4f502so318328985a.3 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:53:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741337609; x=1741942409; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=dLCvL7MTjAjZGB5lfv9MT1kgTWiIaHT/S9+g0TItFt8=; b=CGpv+ceWddJVjGKNDYIP0UjiogoMnRPVoQJJsuorhWLa8X1ko8tmta8HS8ix2XIbiE 67av5RQgkr0b5yto2cC/1NTJw7IkYOtAI5CG5m9XZUkt/26oaEgsV1P4aqYL9HwLP7yg XTFDqYHjNspBXdwlGNvEkFnJUnJOy0nJt1uiskaD/BQfNAdshz1eEKvpk1HnVQwbruuU swDSPP6elcDdVqKhyi63S9NN+hrSyBAiIt6UJVkGu4eDcoVYW4abxEtl/mMMp70Khdd0 R0yoPzRw3tm6TDW3w2nFsUAEgkRR5VVU8hb4bVQAt3xnof3rYIjXK+sI5K7Y3Zlsyzc+ LutA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUun7kXKxjkwr7GgYQHU9izK6/ySy3dhe2GkqV2vmsbEG+Y2Q0xq4M4qxIqdkd2UF5/L8DNZ7xO@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxLxL5B0IqFpMFcbCr3XeOJmMrNWq2YvAjxhu67OikKDdt3wBe3 wgphIzJiUtVLLIdioe66maQbCLPqgNvq6ZY2lr/I8J5RHn3gMA5U94Pb9aGSx+sxwrX+Zqm8HqO 8OjVOCxdPQdeWFsnYJTPYb8mVqb8iecejC52gp/BW8tvMKDi5tRgskkQ= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsKNvnrgIm9310sDwE5VAyfVMPDW7cKNON9dCzhIUNwodey2sdDWm9LE8WoriR bQTHC8zXylT468d81H6kIutHe9+y9hN7OBxU3G79nufNeHiGCmqqWFTEKyTr82+/59qa6m/+XWS UFn9Y4MBgWy0BzLrBAacMOaNCpo3wOVRBYxsAqeHiJ2XP7fMtc3VghECnS5H0nHxm9qI5S6isPF X1BZvf599z1vMFEq9SSCKXp5bOz+r8mdijBDxdIA1TMSbF9jbSk5ZaWKhht6v8UZ+GmP673cNH1 UpkixlbFC9WzaP8SZmRnwRs9gsCjP1Sgh3NKETdhKkBxewmjSbgLyH5DOhNDAVrWrNuabi35C00 qKKCv X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:847:b0:7c3:d86d:940 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7c4e61aa101mr345969985a.54.1741337608800; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:53:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHJPLd70g/e0BjM9dZ6h5h/iDHmxVQ5bPlBK/d3eOLZdc484dJRfYVIn8oWBqWpfXqk/32+PA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:847:b0:7c3:d86d:940 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7c4e61aa101mr345967485a.54.1741337608510; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:53:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb (host-89-240-117-139.as13285.net. [89.240.117.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-7c3e534c76fsm216015285a.41.2025.03.07.00.53.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:53:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 08:53:22 +0000 From: Juri Lelli To: Shrikanth Hegde Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , Waiman Long , Tejun Heo , Johannes Weiner , Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= , Qais Yousef , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Swapnil Sapkal , Phil Auld , luca.abeni@santannapisa.it, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it, Jon Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex Message-ID: References: <20250306141016.268313-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com> <20250306141016.268313-3-juri.lelli@redhat.com> <6894861a-4a40-4c6d-8f48-997b999f5778@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6894861a-4a40-4c6d-8f48-997b999f5778@linux.ibm.com> Hi, Thanks for the overall review! On 07/03/25 12:04, Shrikanth Hegde wrote: > Hi Juri. > > On 3/6/25 19:40, Juri Lelli wrote: > > Create wrappers for sched_domains_mutex so that it can transparently be > > used on both CONFIG_SMP and !CONFIG_SMP, as some function will need to > > do. ... > Maybe sched_domains_mutex can be static since its only used in topology.c ? We have a lockdep_assert in cpuset.c, don't we? We can create another wrapper for that, but I am not sure it is going to be cleaner. Thanks, Juri