From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] cgroup/cpuset: Documentation update for partition Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 14:42:54 -1000 Message-ID: References: <20230627143508.1576882-1-longman@redhat.com> <20230627143508.1576882-9-longman@redhat.com> <6d5aee58-f558-868c-76e0-0b58f8332110@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1689036177; x=1691628177; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=wqRUB5GOcQ1b+cRv1jVfh7t7hV1+cLaTJfgnZElCik8=; b=fStzMHOmVVj1XFBo8m8JIqOV4qRKdD6NBhDqvoD1ujGZh2PM6dkZ8MIBJ+nWzmHb4s UqTFODF5I1PwXsOX3QeWHl+IGXLA/luXJ/HBORQffFBKWEF8mYCkoUGBNi9JXkSLmF/C 9mtLTd4VeoDQjwmzw2bjAPrjcJucK+SOmg2+XmTvGLYk6RyrraW+FuUg/KorzOo5C/gj fP7cTvV3NeWUFAXE1s0ueIlyV6YMAAuDjNiCTv45hXoCDcWSJwc7E56efvP4eH6FwNHg 7GRnvAHRgCQ2K3DHxEnmoCDmBpyQ5Ao0kYyaUd66yabQyM1PyQhcz4h0ZAXL62K0rdlF Yztg== Sender: Tejun Heo Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6d5aee58-f558-868c-76e0-0b58f8332110@redhat.com> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Waiman Long Cc: Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli , Valentin Schneider , Frederic Weisbecker , Mrunal Patel , Ryan Phillips , Brent Rowsell , Peter Hunt , Phil Auld Hello, On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 08:21:43PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > > Wouldn't a partition root's cpus.exclusive always contain all of the CPUs in > > its cpus? Would it make sense for cpus.exclusive to be different from .cpus? > > In auto-filled case, it should be the same as cpuset.cpus. I will clarify > that in the documentation. Thanks for catching that. When the user writes something to the file, what would it mena if the content differs from the cgroup's cpuset.cpus? Thanks. -- tejun