From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/18] cgroup/misc: Add per resource callbacks for CSS events Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 07:55:45 -1000 Message-ID: References: <20230913040635.28815-1-haitao.huang@linux.intel.com> <20230913040635.28815-2-haitao.huang@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1694800547; x=1695405347; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=WaFcn1QzXPssaV1y6SpztPUVojrCHgnKF1dhNtlMGp4=; b=gkZvq6P00k5PUTsA89cAMAWHBG2rxmwaEnZaA1Dui3FGpsn8CeB6QBfPyADwkiSNrX dqbWmJtalDGj5/icUCkXffvKVzMU2S6nva0A26HdrYFmBs2t7P5B/J2ATtwKiZ1j+MYG 2kPEGTe/9HLgHjsjCZgEfKkLjbMvACBlDtNVbpg9vRXszJoJgwtrflTxaCtTTA93fR2r IfmnBFcvAahdRUryWm17p1BZAbKnWi4jn0bebTAKb1SAbW8UUDySzppGIlEGQbGfuHR3 BOl30qLJyJiDa5ZRx7N64CdbR1t4IhQX4BiToTfkCEY3EE/iR2Dl5Dn4OH8BNxkjOinm RPRw== Sender: Tejun Heo Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230913040635.28815-2-haitao.huang@linux.intel.com> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Haitao Huang Cc: jarkko@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, sohil.mehta@intel.com, zhiquan1.li@intel.com, kristen@linux.intel.com, seanjc@google.com, zhanb@microsoft.com, anakrish@microsoft.com, mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com, yangjie@microsoft.com On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 09:06:18PM -0700, Haitao Huang wrote: > @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ struct misc_res { > u64 max; > atomic64_t usage; > atomic64_t events; > + > + /* per resource callback ops */ > + int (*misc_cg_alloc)(struct misc_cg *cg); > + void (*misc_cg_free)(struct misc_cg *cg); > + void (*misc_cg_max_write)(struct misc_cg *cg); A nit about naming. These are already in misc_res and cgroup_ and cgrp_ prefixes are a lot more common. So, maybe go for sth like cgrp_alloc? Thanks. -- tejun