From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07236E7C4E2 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 17:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243655AbjJDRSc (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2023 13:18:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34710 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233674AbjJDRSb (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2023 13:18:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AE58AB; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 10:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1c60a514f3aso19000385ad.3; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:18:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1696439908; x=1697044708; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=J+L+GSCOF/70j5QTPg78IQxFAzwzFud8rAzHLyG8ZaM=; b=d+7qG9DPkCmy3PRA5HwSbSyojQA8GcY59QcnLG8TQWFIm8QdcBDVCIpJFtmh5psjYf aF7LAW5zcEh0fIfPgwhXu15slUnVufPLuPtugiQ73tZawQvCh+zMZ8geQ2qEFNIeBb5k v8B4Zq16KhDkzMDd4hzSBo9Dxh6cg9jBCTGpwB3VRcvfmHSwXJ6E+M5eVD4eIB7j/0HQ 8j0iFG+R0uHzsKcFHeN496Qmft7xCQ9MXtOtmU77VYgb7u/GsDOuFRvqTFlBE0MefMQd ygU2v6lHG/arARG9p/a9gNJyV0ShkbPGstpsWF9PLc1vq7wvVzVx+3xFcfzQWdj7UYPk RK6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696439908; x=1697044708; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=J+L+GSCOF/70j5QTPg78IQxFAzwzFud8rAzHLyG8ZaM=; b=huxqExjoTl0g8/y3J9Z05Kg+3vELvQ47H+1ADmM89lZK6AghC1UFPRQNhqD+b+Wyvg JOyIS7ip89Up8GrjsQgF8jsQmGCWpSmqRY+t69Yz68dtvRNHmiDqn6+KAurfyZXB5tFB TTaNZ461bvY4eDWQlqDI0eAkq7rjDk0G+nI/6XucfVR1Qlz932ZsDh2ucrcY/NURS+BW yiETa437SrwxWIZegq1Yb12KMtHtu21iUIBWt9aUhVh0h8cjH6ug2cQkIS2xE48A3J+z +kGIdWuwVQ7HAr8266tAmc8jl6iwbYlLCNiujn1XC3hUJbwp1KVzFzSXGUHgBBzFfnIl /pjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz8M8eX3c/cl08Tk2jVG5+6djUoM9iUGunLGA3PMstQ3rh7Zz5b a9v337CaiLuq9MV3dDygT5g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH9/qymEfnLixMr37Go2E/Ci9z1JbZZkJLBLNgvVh5yJK4UeNUCz5JI6nvjM81CnG9QZkCAaA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:248:b0:1c7:495c:87e0 with SMTP id j8-20020a170903024800b001c7495c87e0mr3089322plh.37.1696439908317; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c090:400::4:cef]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ju4-20020a170903428400b001c73f3a9b7fsm3985474plb.185.2023.10.04.10.18.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:18:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Tejun Heo Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 07:18:26 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Haitao Huang Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, sohil.mehta@intel.com, zhiquan1.li@intel.com, kristen@linux.intel.com, seanjc@google.com, zhanb@microsoft.com, anakrish@microsoft.com, mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com, yangjie@microsoft.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/18] cgroup/misc: Add per resource callbacks for CSS events Message-ID: References: <20230923030657.16148-1-haitao.huang@linux.intel.com> <20230923030657.16148-2-haitao.huang@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 10:45:08AM -0500, Haitao Huang wrote: > So I will update to something like following. Let me know if that's correct > understanding. > @tj, I'd appreciate for your input on whether this is acceptable from > cgroups side. Yeah, that's fine by me and I can't tell what actual differences the two would have in practice. Thanks. -- tejun