Linux cgroups development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	Cestmir Kalina <ckalina@redhat.com>,
	Costa Shulyupin <cshulyup@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/isolation: Exclude dynamically isolated CPUs from housekeeping masks
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:21:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgIHBaF0gGQTKlvU@pavilion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229021414.508972-2-longman@redhat.com>

Le Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 09:14:13PM -0500, Waiman Long a écrit :
> The housekeeping CPU masks, set up by the "isolcpus" and "nohz_full"
> boot command line options, are used at boot time to exclude selected CPUs
> from running some kernel background processes to minimize disturbance
> to latency sensitive userspace applications. Some of housekeeping CPU
> masks are also checked at run time to avoid using those isolated CPUs.
> 
> The cpuset subsystem is now able to dynamically create a set of isolated
> CPUs to be used in isolated cpuset partitions. The long term goal is
> to make the degree of isolation as close as possible to what can be
> done statically using those boot command line options.
> 
> This patch is a step in that direction by making the housekeeping CPU
> mask APIs exclude the dynamically isolated CPUs when they are called
> at run time. The housekeeping CPU masks will fall back to the bootup
> default when all the dynamically isolated CPUs are released.
> 
> A new housekeeping_exlude_isolcpus() function is added which is to be
> called by the cpuset subsystem to provide a list of isolated CPUs to
> be excluded.

Can we instead overwrite housekeeping_boot.cpumasks from cpusets entirely and
forget about the original boot value forever?

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-25 23:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-29  2:14 [PATCH 0/2] isolation: Exclude dynamically isolated CPUs from housekeeping masks Waiman Long
2024-02-29  2:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/isolation: " Waiman Long
2024-03-25 23:21   ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-03-29  0:56     ` Waiman Long
2024-02-29  2:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] cgroup/cpuset: Exclude isolated CPUs from housekeeping CPU masks Waiman Long
2024-02-29 20:41   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZgIHBaF0gGQTKlvU@pavilion.home \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ckalina@redhat.com \
    --cc=cshulyup@redhat.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox