From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-185.mta1.migadu.com (out-185.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80C0A20DC5 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 19:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.185 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720811021; cv=none; b=G9CHHH1R7kANYMOzJ6e+X+GILRLVnfpn4se/PeGBz2uX1S6OG5Noj6BAbZxFi0rK+n5YhK++mO7pM5o8ntR9i6iBARDipcnWwlOJJgWJcRNCl2msBx0eBHiiLuag67SBJopXdTx/Fc+ZDQqa6u/z5Re9tFw5L3na+UqwD1bWHbs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720811021; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CtM4FGwNaaAB6iqfvkVdldke1e2NZnvN4Dw2cpw8N/Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OlH0gj94xsel283rYFxoHLaMsvRNZV2LFS8V1/BESFA8Xf0UBQHG0qZYYYQBF2iK2WWGAnUqsDUqMrPb+Q9Zh4Jenrk7ULyKYz84zKLN+Sz1iqJGYBsqpaM7TpxT37gS7Xuy5F76/+HQvsLW+8KDXIERNztZN9qws7Q7LbS1NX4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=WzRGuiVQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.185 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="WzRGuiVQ" X-Envelope-To: oliver.sang@intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1720811016; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xokTGIcbCZnOMGy0HZ37jDBn5F/GMmCC7eG7GDBjcFQ=; b=WzRGuiVQSmqYLqsiWmtfR7l++VDbVBDv/TAs2Um2Qasw8mzbR3J/WdP9pScAJrN7nRkV83 5nyf7Pe+V7+FeWbfhTAHiYbTIYqFWb4Sr6qeE+2PTOgO1jakDakMTEfrc2gK+VWeLi9p5R 2yuyt8gQ3Gg/sYchbg6QrbrNC3lg2iQ= X-Envelope-To: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev X-Envelope-To: lkp@intel.com X-Envelope-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Envelope-To: akpm@linux-foundation.org X-Envelope-To: shakeel.butt@linux.dev X-Envelope-To: hannes@cmpxchg.org X-Envelope-To: mhocko@kernel.org X-Envelope-To: muchun.song@linux.dev X-Envelope-To: cgroups@vger.kernel.org X-Envelope-To: ying.huang@intel.com X-Envelope-To: feng.tang@intel.com X-Envelope-To: fengwei.yin@intel.com Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 19:03:31 +0000 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Roman Gushchin To: kernel test robot Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, Linux Memory Management List , Andrew Morton , Shakeel Butt , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Muchun Song , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [mm] 98c9daf5ae: aim7.jobs-per-min -29.4% regression Message-ID: References: <202407121335.31a10cb6-oliver.sang@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202407121335.31a10cb6-oliver.sang@intel.com> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 02:04:48PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > Hello, > > kernel test robot noticed a -29.4% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min on: > > > commit: 98c9daf5ae6be008f78c07b744bcff7bcc6e98da ("mm: memcg: guard memcg1-specific members of struct mem_cgroup_per_node") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master Hello, thank you for the report! I'd expect that the regression should be fixed by the commit "mm: memcg: add cache line padding to mem_cgroup_per_node". Can you, please, confirm that it's not the case? Thank you!