From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F95A283695; Thu, 22 May 2025 19:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747941084; cv=none; b=G1lYHD1IagpjoctgH4gIsVLqSME0naCRBrgapABoDBFkKd5rXU+UGH5S9pQlBkZ907NM9QBNzbpj+LOYdfRKRXH9/Y6k7mRrKdUMfnoI3x33vmbPW8rXyI/HRwYmHcSlvQ6xu8GGYcLi0d0/61hVFBBH7cLLqJDU5ihKG7tOgBI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747941084; c=relaxed/simple; bh=d1GJR2yf3eXDuTrxjW9QBdEVd+3EjCiKg9xwQQxttOQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QlyBmPtx3kMkr7H9zKLLxhx4zSjgEa4JalY4cU0qxDoKEVA2d+D7SzYlP0aq9aghPz6E8QaALZ7J4Mj4sdYHqalhE+BTZNb4rW1ZTNTK4j0qQBjlW2J9ODNh597eQyh0CoahTonlxytGHo4RWLNllckoqme7Ram0NpiyVaFNH/Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=u6yVGDdB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="u6yVGDdB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 953C6C4CEE4; Thu, 22 May 2025 19:11:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747941083; bh=d1GJR2yf3eXDuTrxjW9QBdEVd+3EjCiKg9xwQQxttOQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=u6yVGDdBCzXLf2x8Ri7watNeTgW/rcP8rfsKl1ku2L1p4dUNyWsu75/DQxwrfIEP9 kmLs/sHBCIYtlBFS37Z03UAUddMJjdKG92PGcSkJnvZmZDKjLGZjdRv8swXYgGwt4C K793tvJKoKJ8NkYeuRiLB4JGVc9iOoq35ipDTGwHFKamdCKxbog9gTpuw5pRFbz7eD +kmzW7V9SVPrtFdxmz6VZiT6tYioko/FCkX1sJlZHKk8aRIAg8vhurQZCIMcychs9i QcO3LvLFWcxfyJnhk1q9ytr8GuKhevoq/mztEFrLJ4Jb1A2XZ7vvZor3+w3dlin/8v 63nfkzQIXE+lw== Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 09:11:22 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Shashank Balaji Cc: Johannes Weiner , Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= , Jonathan Corbet , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shinya Takumi Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] cgroup, docs: cpu controller's interaction with various scheduling policies Message-ID: References: <20250522-rt-and-cpu-controller-doc-v3-0-483fc9cca591@sony.com> <20250522-rt-and-cpu-controller-doc-v3-3-483fc9cca591@sony.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250522-rt-and-cpu-controller-doc-v3-3-483fc9cca591@sony.com> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 11:08:14AM +0900, Shashank Balaji wrote: > The cpu controller interface files account for or affect processes > differently based on their scheduling policy, and the underlying > scheduler used (fair-class vs. BPF scheduler). Document these > differences > > Signed-off-by: Shashank Balaji Applied to cgroup/for-6.16. Thanks. -- tejun