From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA29042A80; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 20:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759869848; cv=none; b=qqLcJXxPU4lI8sjr1JItT52JP6T0OFUhbw4UWONouyI99QTOtT2B3lykhD/9tA2LtUandvPUetqW3PC1QsjvZcuYDNFuA9AF1W9clzYJM5n9nK+zXrCmbMvU5p/gtCK1LJhLEEn6FAc0319JcU/HZ+gs1xjYIBP+zmaex93yIj4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759869848; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zTa4e6WH7DBvW/Pu4qXQlmyCPUVs15E3RIqGPwcCq3w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kVK4u0/gbT//dnecQ/Hwh+U7xmTZlbOXzF5DEXEMPgrY9ZUTBHglKVjbC6ZJIbRKjXLtqJnlTKD7/1qAF/WvSen/9WA2e+/BRIqOfMdTz2FKHRppt4xUG7qLNo6PPripGfGQMEQV3tLzylYSFYwKy1R5QrI5WCjG+HzKskrJJWM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lz6Zrtqk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lz6Zrtqk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A0DDC4CEF1; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 20:44:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1759869845; bh=zTa4e6WH7DBvW/Pu4qXQlmyCPUVs15E3RIqGPwcCq3w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lz6ZrtqkwAZKmO2fxsKgLuTRc2rbEsGRiyTibZZvkQT6KXrT3gEQIakzn/Hn4ZDGr pp7veliee33E3TpSPaM5D/lu4gry9E1OMPRm8V0Hsq3AnF6LSq+S5wLI3BhLKlvIl6 jq7MY/pIz2UX1ON75mVTH/TM2nXYUTb2Dsg+CAQgi/R5NkR/AfUFRcdkKHZnDoCXa5 J5wVGZxk/man3U6XnnEM2ABu7A+scJdjleuW2Xqyz+am7gW2yXL3sCBe+Mo2mx0Jti GvLbN6zAsLU+vmcd+QBigCWRY+mDHBLu2KhM8jws/lx+2X+gKGW5ZOVC/Zk3Wiwb26 OOw/bUnyC7yeQ== Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 10:44:04 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com, longman@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com, void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com, changwoo@igalia.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, liuwenfang@honor.com, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] sched: Match __task_rq_{,un}lock() Message-ID: References: <20251006104402.946760805@infradead.org> <20251006104527.813272361@infradead.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251006104527.813272361@infradead.org> On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 12:44:13PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > In preparation to adding more rules to __task_rq_lock(), such that > __task_rq_unlock() will no longer be requivalent to rq_unlock(), ^ typo Thanks. -- tejun