From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 872A0E555 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 07:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.169 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768546845; cv=none; b=EU+Cav7etHAwhknGlS+Hoc03g8gpvXjXBQuIink6pvTrtCq6g7iHjYt5XVsQpRVgGGm4FdB/i/3P4Xe0zNcqAnBY4I/Lxwuri0L7yvKhgoGCzkoqadfh4iu1biRgHwhhYtIifTIo/KOcCp5Fvlp0d9MxrNrqu+/lho0bENMECg0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768546845; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dYxTOubKvkA7tWmjuxqaKdwdnW63JufKL+TPAWpNhbQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uWBrbUQFNYpOFiNrOYSdjKip3bIfDaDVggRMRBofSfw0JbP42obZyGtfAvBcGPIE6nPrM261HO7GEqqdz8M/m9BGPg35bXAUKjXALvU1bu04XioS0AynCkaH1HLVoZWe2qQuA/zUdCUj3QXIvmGXy2OX0dz5ROWia4E61Iq5b18= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=Up1EMB8O; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.169 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="Up1EMB8O" Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-29f02651fccso48065ad.0 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 23:00:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1768546844; x=1769151644; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Yjk/HuTCyBmTrKEgW/VvGyUH8+Hoy04Wh+N75d7lrKA=; b=Up1EMB8Odo22rD3WeSULo7G+twhz3BY8qdbcCEYbcNFDLrsLRxTLRgb48UIcOVmvUb N8C69Frs3qKc0FPO9G6YKzrTh1Qdv/Zh1mwlI+UST13OGWTYEgs0shVXF6XXh5zDWyBa 5GRP4CDLpQKIVlNf57SpEzAVasMyrzkR7E5bxQIWmL6OBUpTJJHJNDNh04XggWjqX4/a mm0qOEK/+1z0cmA8MNDuIu7LqtciWvLQiWuVqY6nRXQgu3+Z4jGOglyYDG6MQp1tjAG3 rmEQqXfniPwBoUeD9nwwwqsgaCWnZzDowlKNIke01OMw1DtD4X4rsaxrH4IFuJzrrel3 g4Lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1768546844; x=1769151644; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Yjk/HuTCyBmTrKEgW/VvGyUH8+Hoy04Wh+N75d7lrKA=; b=jdhF2eu4anF5RhRAIhKV7AiQE25k4yXUD623/Q5y8Pv7RJGNFQ4ie7vasNpSuJsmps TgxF0TVbr6wC1RkXE6bkLokIcctBMdnY5yWOUekZKroD4dBIoWct8rF8NsFuKH6nz9gj ecVMfvvS6hgc+s8Pt+eS2nKZJsqwgsE8i+KzDEJY3HRXxTx4meiDsGtbvcnztYIS3Phj 5HqL9aAqMVSEEeTdecnghRuSpNbW+qodttsu0LEEk7bf83QiHtgNuzGBJ8BpnRxrFVs0 dqbVgjwgAP0NYs+r6ghC5hx5WjaYaCdxNRoint0v1lO0YYHK24BlTqnN2QUcA2Ipiar3 FhTQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXhWF8Lh8MpUjvQWo92htv7IYgsDQj5I/GrE0jlE8MFbprX+Y/STDVCKLlbMQ1sHrE77zEfFh+7@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxrBxdH8SI9sNApALE5zPHyX1sXzPR71pZCyTYsUtQt4g07CUpQ wdvQ6pD+ac7nWzNb0MjCWEwHZxEq3BpJxb8p4GydsH1gAhbtgBucWeYEHwFHp8QpAg== X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX7T+gx4+jwMBXrbc/jliC9rs1GBmB+Q01x+BSm/tFsIZdjaEIWUrPdHg9NA2uv 9R2LQKISYyQz0pp93bDdXqVYjaWTVbgNW5CE8RS+Xgdk7iLI+IdO7RJC3mvmLbzzI/JT8Z3dp+a NxyaHJaVU5th2in2vtad5S1YYw6wxUr2vHqyPgLOe5AdYy3FkRb9cBDjGtZpR6knPPC6XHZ7nhP pXcixN7eCek2XWx89OnL3fFtKhk5LxH49yTsQxt+zkiVwRvpmKDVmRwfUvCzCIq5FD4s/7G0Qor nAoWT3GLkxEYcScXojfIEnMtTCbhXc5CneODzOhs7I6iqrLxEWm4twcsLhghEEYEyAhS1rd5G+4 fuUjuLWxvqjVLT35hr3EFMhXdXVWONY0WvFtnTD3FJcpK/hTj7EYvSq6nImu3UTlXggNPzFZIut rEFh1xZNqjShCmDoe8BzZrbZQTZ82l/T0SjD0bJy6MmMu4Ab+alw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ecc9:b0:2a3:ccfa:c41f with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2a71a96bcf1mr1526965ad.1.1768546843624; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 23:00:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (130.15.125.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.125.15.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-81fa1094e23sm1195803b3a.4.2026.01.15.23.00.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Jan 2026 23:00:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 07:00:37 +0000 From: Bing Jiao To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Hildenbrand , Lorenzo Stoakes , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Axel Rasmussen , Yuanchu Xie , Wei Xu , Johannes Weiner , Qi Zheng , Shakeel Butt , Gregory Price , Joshua Hahn , muchun.song@linux.dev, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, tj@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] mm/vmscan: fix demotion targets checks in reclaim/demotion Message-ID: References: <20260114070053.2446770-1-bingjiao@google.com> <20260114205305.2869796-1-bingjiao@google.com> <20260115160011.29dca1c262ab1fb887857508@linux-foundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260115160011.29dca1c262ab1fb887857508@linux-foundation.org> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 04:00:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 20:53:01 +0000 Bing Jiao wrote: > > > I’m resubmitting the full refreshed patch series together this time. > > I just realized it is better to include the unmodified patches alongside > > the modified ones to ensure compatibility with upstream automated tools > > and to simplify your review process. > > No probs. > > [1/2] is cc:stable whereas [2/2] is not. Ordinarily that means I must > split the series apart (they take different routes) and often discard > the [0/n]. Hi Andrew, Thank you for the explanation. I appreciate the insight into the upstream process and the time you have taken to review this series. I wish I had known this earlier so as not to add to your workload. > In this case I think I'll leave things as-is, so [1/2]'s entry into the > -stable pipeline will occur a few weeks later. I don't think the > problem is serious enough to need super-fast-tracking? > > Hopefully this approach means we'll get some Reviewed-bys ;) I agree that the issue does not require urgent fast-tracking, so leaving the series as-is for the standard pipeline is appropriate. Best regards, Bing