From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com (mail-wm1-f65.google.com [209.85.128.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E660205E25 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 09:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.65 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771837875; cv=none; b=CEJZ6QT9Eh3t8zLBwiLFcdQ3kifwcNlL83J3DXJzKzDqg0S4KEUWxQoOK8lqn8wp/7SfK8jv3hcIcOGt3Ohei1pJE2ui2n6ndWt05ecJgryzer1TwKEAZvps+Rq3GE7C/UlpNAl4l0rhs2PP8yXIpXkkOXbKms+ITFDxtvyRc2k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771837875; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LORZo0OqfXIv0sBvk1bkOwYJ+YcFeKevt/s0WaS++LI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=RILlfIVPHe1v3eGVxRIBfxzGFrdFUgrUBpbXtZQwjlQw8Uu6L4ApD0TovSTvIVO21ErhU06TfS+vwuC4ibsu3le0mxZxFlRzbnRfrigX81PJvwuniPkY4tdlcPgx8VzrbLV1OBm8A0/Ymn/KkoaSuXv5eLVshmVM2hpW4Aq8CpQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=TvkUgvak; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.65 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="TvkUgvak" Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4836f363d0dso35296505e9.3 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 01:11:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1771837873; x=1772442673; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DC3YEg3VT9TOzY2WonmsTGNTfL3zmdr5vQ17Y5LSPTM=; b=TvkUgvakPIYtI0+QfM5CCZ6jo6JZF4nFCxkbhmnyBh0xFEcRphb08gBsCtkmp+BnGy JEI17aBrXmps0rxICD4eMJNRWgW7DoB0rrxFZHMOmjBKKJ8jgq9G7VgV2cNIjRiinUbT 4XG5g5LhXB5BzqPxBQ0QwR8yoYh/qZn70wb4dvd4bjkdxMID8OTW4ca821tMSl0Q98u8 EyWNfZUX4P8Qo4R3n5Sdlr/VVvjV+0jRDQLQ/6taC00D5Q0e10okuORc0YaAF/DBmHXj oTpA/o7tUCVUswKvvGCYu+PoRycMkjLg2dQ1r7xMC0Kzs+DS9l4Y1nwF38a/vOUy0tum iSMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1771837873; x=1772442673; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DC3YEg3VT9TOzY2WonmsTGNTfL3zmdr5vQ17Y5LSPTM=; b=aRnJMbemMT7fGtOfxOHLSo/94s7XVTccZngn9NNbZhTaV9Gg4rk1WqHeMr/QsMnXeN rBtI9r19V9aOODcspoqGdtkkswvp7Nve+t1yHr+ZWErmT74M1TKMtZ1wpwt173rL8tvm J/sTFF93KnhFM+dmzmnVWfDGUfaQ24BMUgIeEw97V2FlEFniVBxiPWYmp4U2PkK4RfLt vV3sf9SwxEM+NRCCvZsDnadKp+xrT8wR/6wgrFA/GqmxFs9f2DCtdOotRuMCw3thZGoB F7zNSC6dB605eV06IDGaaZoL1NGvhpnWqo8Dyt7B4jqmjPJjC5f+GcbY2qFzhbnYjZuf b+8A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUkZqHANHALGB68mR/s1ujbB74EiFiYXc5R1On6QsBMODfOMxWHSGoOpXjXR21M/F5lQQh3Mdpt@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxJ5NyrbcnEErxSAi4B50b7l+bKUZ3QVKsR42ZtszEKwKDEvKlq rXDAcyJ2JMC5RPy+IIX5aw/bsK8U2fwhk+WGiD95LVRMRAIkt+K+sIAcc9Tc+tOVKnc= X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aJl18qYDjhUp6BFuOyedFXE6R8ZbNX9f0hSXlqmfHaYTNanKHhHotqWLDfsqYT hfNv/xjsrig/mXiqXcez0LNFhSVYv0ZRhzftPkMxcwgx8r5u9Ac6BUELooxOZ+6bPSGGdpjvsGu dBeWP3adoMJqENoPpMurySdwruZwOuSHM391RyTZU9vTO5xG50vrhEQKrUTng3CMnW16sJrHfDW Oep5IX1cNWwsYP6ETEFz/IHkoQxGr4VQni6b7JtSqcwwk7gprB9r/66lducuJnxLhi3feSU7r0x D8zIlqvoybdUI831JM14xcrZSKc5hgnV2xtXQHOaTC0/iqUuigONlLlJa+YzllPmGjIUu5TRe+O kXcEW5bhHuK1CJSYUGv/EPUNMJoRERVohEiCx4nh5XJJD6yFzufEbQJXNBWC3lpPtmwhYRm1dpH wQKtSZB5PbgbxlCwg1BFFxM6egRlbwbPU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:699b:b0:480:6941:d38b with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-483a963baf7mr117526035e9.30.1771837872861; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 01:11:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (109-81-84-7.rct.o2.cz. [109.81.84.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-483a9cab38dsm159620255e9.9.2026.02.23.01.11.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 23 Feb 2026 01:11:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 10:11:11 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Vlastimil Babka , Leonardo Bras , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Johannes Weiner , Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , Muchun Song , Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Vlastimil Babka , Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>, Leonardo Bras , Thomas Gleixner , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Introduce QPW for per-cpu operations Message-ID: References: <3f2b985a-2fb0-4d63-9dce-8a9cad8ce464@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri 20-02-26 16:01:59, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 06:58:10PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: [...] > > >> So if we can assume that workloads on isolated cpus make syscalls only > > >> rarely, and when they do they can tolerate them being slower, I think the > > >> "avoid sheaves on isolated cpus" would be the best way here. > > > > > > I am not sure its safe to assume that. Ask Gemini about isolcpus use > > > cases and: > > > > I don't think it's answering the question about syscalls. But didn't read > > too closely given the nature of it. > > People use isolcpus with all kinds of programs. > > > > For example, AF_XDP bypass uses system calls (and wants isolcpus): > > > > > > https://www.quantvps.com/blog/kernel-bypass-in-hft?srsltid=AfmBOoryeSxuuZjzTJIC9O-Ag8x4gSwjs-V4Xukm2wQpGmwDJ6t4szuE > > > > Didn't spot system calls mentioned TBH. > > I don't see why you want to reduce performance of applications that > execute on isolcpus=, if you can avoid that. If you can avoid that by making performance bad for everybody else then then it seems safer to sacrifice those workloads that are much more special - i.e. cpu isolation. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs