From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: "Brendan Jackman" <jackmanb@google.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Clark Williams" <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/page_alloc: rename FPI_TRYLOCK -> FPI_NOLOCK
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:14:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ada7bf29-1bd2-4de0-bf3c-0916f0ce512f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715-spin-trylock-followup-v3-1-fc4d246f705d@google.com>
On 7/15/26 13:03, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> As discussed in the linked patch, the there is some inconsistency between
> "trylock" and "nolock" nomenclature, let's align it. Since "nolock" is
> used in the public API it seems to have more mindshare so do that.
>
> The linked patch did this for the ALLOC_ flag but forgot about FPI_.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260703-alloc-trylock-v5-1-c87b714e19d3@google.com/
> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index af63558391345..c2da85e69a0f8 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ typedef int __bitwise fpi_t;
> #define FPI_TO_TAIL ((__force fpi_t)BIT(1))
>
> /* Free the page without taking locks. Rely on trylock only. */
> -#define FPI_TRYLOCK ((__force fpi_t)BIT(2))
> +#define FPI_NOLOCK ((__force fpi_t)BIT(2))
>
> /* free_pages_prepare() has already been called for page(s) being freed. */
> #define FPI_PREPARED ((__force fpi_t)BIT(3))
> @@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ static __always_inline bool __free_pages_prepare(struct page *page,
> page_table_check_free(page, order);
> pgalloc_tag_sub(page, 1 << order);
>
> - if (!PageHighMem(page) && !(fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK)) {
> + if (!PageHighMem(page) && !(fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK)) {
> debug_check_no_locks_freed(page_address(page),
> PAGE_SIZE << order);
> debug_check_no_obj_freed(page_address(page),
> @@ -1558,7 +1558,7 @@ static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> struct llist_head *llhead;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - if (unlikely(fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK)) {
> + if (unlikely(fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK)) {
> if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags)) {
> add_page_to_zone_llist(zone, page, order);
> return;
> @@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
>
> /* The lock succeeded. Process deferred pages. */
> llhead = &zone->trylock_free_pages;
> - if (unlikely(!llist_empty(llhead) && !(fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK))) {
> + if (unlikely(!llist_empty(llhead) && !(fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK))) {
> struct llist_node *llnode;
> struct page *p, *tmp;
>
> @@ -2882,7 +2882,7 @@ static bool free_frozen_page_commit(struct zone *zone,
> if (pcp->free_count < (batch << CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX))
> pcp->free_count += (1 << order);
>
> - if (unlikely(fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK)) {
> + if (unlikely(fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK)) {
> /*
> * Do not attempt to take a zone lock. Let pcp->count get
> * over high mark temporarily.
> @@ -2979,7 +2979,7 @@ static void __free_frozen_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
> migratetype = MIGRATE_MOVABLE;
> }
>
> - if (unlikely((fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
> + if (unlikely((fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
> && (in_nmi() || in_hardirq()))) {
> add_page_to_zone_llist(zone, page, order);
> return;
> @@ -3002,7 +3002,7 @@ void free_frozen_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
>
> void free_frozen_pages_nolock(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> {
> - __free_frozen_pages(page, order, FPI_TRYLOCK);
> + __free_frozen_pages(page, order, FPI_NOLOCK);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -5399,7 +5399,7 @@ struct page *__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order,
> if (memcg_kmem_online() && (gfp & __GFP_ACCOUNT) && page &&
> unlikely(__memcg_kmem_charge_page(page, gfp, order) != 0)) {
> __free_frozen_pages(page, order,
> - alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOLOCK ? FPI_TRYLOCK : 0);
> + alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOLOCK ? FPI_NOLOCK : 0);
> page = NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -5522,7 +5522,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__free_pages);
> */
> void free_pages_nolock(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> {
> - ___free_pages(page, order, FPI_TRYLOCK);
> + ___free_pages(page, order, FPI_NOLOCK);
> }
>
> /**
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 11:03 [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/page_alloc: couple of followups for recent cleanups Brendan Jackman
2026-07-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/page_alloc: rename FPI_TRYLOCK -> FPI_NOLOCK Brendan Jackman
2026-07-15 13:14 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
2026-07-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] cgroup/cpuset: update some comments about the page allocator Brendan Jackman
2026-07-15 13:16 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm/page_alloc: fixup alloc_pages_nolock_noprof() comment Brendan Jackman
2026-07-15 13:17 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm/page_alloc: remove a couple of VM_BUG_ON()st Brendan Jackman
2026-07-15 13:25 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-15 13:48 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-07-15 13:56 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ada7bf29-1bd2-4de0-bf3c-0916f0ce512f@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox