From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F51EC2FB; Mon, 1 Sep 2025 01:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756690742; cv=none; b=Lp91VBCHt43fXs+zTWQcoJqtDDhYv8DVPqlpRCR5mfwUG09cBF5jzVzzyKWUpRmfKoSo3Sz3h6R02XnjqJM4qbCiyU0+u8SW1xzl33MWUvgEh0GbyDLPbqtvAcyNoNxmeIdcG9u4GyWfxKplMP6GP4dDpLgcaVoTrB/FXwNneUs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756690742; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KqqRGi+FKxfSAlLjJ4JXNrkj2FkYJBf8wMDLSDjDHNE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Jk7oFVMhwpQxCZ4Az2sgcOt+8WbMfiGo+i70ouFtg4ptmjnLYQ8bT6gjqXPtigWoHKLrabxFsshtowGZo1UPk6gQ51y0jpICKzYiFamPjU4EwU9WB3Iq0Ij/OSI6Tkc/P/t9DxIdx8VBid0Pko79jPyEXTdRmsNQyMSstAI60hg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4cFWk44l17zYQv6L; Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:38:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3031C1A08C9; Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:38:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.109.79] (unknown [10.67.109.79]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgDXII0p+bRoEMbrAw--.24215S2; Mon, 01 Sep 2025 09:38:51 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:38:49 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cgroup/psi: Set of->priv to NULL upon file release To: Tejun Heo , Greg KH Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com, peterz@infradead.org, zhouchengming@bytedance.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huawei.com, libaokun1@huawei.com References: <20250822070715.1565236-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> <20250822070715.1565236-3-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> <2025082322-canopener-snugness-14e3@gregkh> Content-Language: en-US From: Chen Ridong In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CM-TRANSID:gCh0CgDXII0p+bRoEMbrAw--.24215S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUUYV7kC6x804xWl14x267AKxVW8JVW5JwAF c2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2ocxC64kIII 0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK021l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26w1j6s0DM28EF7xv wVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4UJVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4 x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG 64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JrI_JrylYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r 1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvEwIxGrwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2kI c2xKxwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCF54CYxVCY1x0262kKe7AKxVWUtVW8ZwCFx2IqxVCFs4 IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1r MI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jw0_GFylIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJV WUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j 6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYx BIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07UQzVbUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: hfkh02xlgr0w46kxt4xhlfz01xgou0bp/ On 2025/8/26 1:32, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Greg. > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 08:43:48AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >>> Applied to cgroup/for-6.17-fixes. >> >> Both or just this second patch? Should I take the first through the >> driver-core tree, or do you want to take it through the cgroup tree? No >> objection from me for you to take both :) > > Sorry about the lack of clarity. Just the second one. The first one looks > fine to me but it would probably be more appropriate if you take it. > > Thanks! > Hello all, Any other opinions? Can this patch be applied? -- Best regards, Ridong