From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-173.mta0.migadu.com (out-173.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6A7648B37F for ; Mon, 18 May 2026 16:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779122359; cv=none; b=CRhtiK58w9IN7CWQuZBUpL3FINcBYsyuPz8VWuqAOiljcca6dmk145cfJmSByK+lhID01KzOG38WzOd6GrzhueRys8nHxaMhktTItPoyzybAuwV4OdDyCU77ttWvWJcgUTn4jlrLm+29UJCEtmY4PGTT4WMx66G7W38LjjI4g9o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779122359; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z5w9VXbDHWwaa8GVmJp3zwsvqS01hbJy9WgyvIuVziI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rlzdMH+Q+du3Ss1UDsp1qhH/zGYrI5IqJrg8P5Nzfitng3a1XJue93av8fwJMwRyuV232qGJAuZK0RMB6ctC1uEY3WV0hed2rY00u/D7YxqQy/KM1/2USHJ7+Ac/mqE3BDAhq0zGRa4LTFYn00RcF70zidXmgF7uA+UTz0EodyE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=DNddHhbv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="DNddHhbv" Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 09:39:00 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1779122354; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0nZ63ixZmpqUJEA5mKwrCc5eEpjyHEZj+MQ/sAMlFNc=; b=DNddHhbvcHQnPyEBvcPR9NtOSklLhywR8EirOQ96GAmA+rzZiYis8KgdOh8x1VAI9yoEy2 dQjevyx1qO5hKUKowEGy0TSwsu5TQUnrM/+/41zgvP6qWIj1gn7+I6f+JyVifHW5vBhTsP SDEfwZbGPAPLwQR2n6ulKWf1Jwj9/5k= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Shakeel Butt To: Oliver Sang Cc: Qi Zheng , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , David Carlier , Allen Pais , Axel Rasmussen , Baoquan He , Chengming Zhou , Chen Ridong , David Hildenbrand , Hamza Mahfooz , Harry Yoo , Hugh Dickins , Imran Khan , Johannes Weiner , Kamalesh Babulal , Lance Yang , Liam Howlett , Lorenzo Stoakes , Michal Hocko , Michal =?utf-8?Q?Koutn=C3=BD?= , Mike Rapoport , Muchun Song , Muchun Song , Nhat Pham , Roman Gushchin , Suren Baghdasaryan , Usama Arif , Vlastimil Babka , Wei Xu , Yosry Ahmed , Yuanchu Xie , Zi Yan , Usama Arif , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [linus:master] [mm] 01b9da291c: stress-ng.switch.ops_per_sec 67.7% regression Message-ID: References: <0e1b8994-944d-4dda-8966-3cd43661796d@linux.dev> <46e9f5cf-34cb-466d-a53a-5778768af4d9@linux.dev> <93b7c3f206f158e7387cbb5f0bf5845b59b93053@linux.dev> <19693be6-7132-446e-b3fc-b7e9f56e5949@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 12:38:48PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 08:55:50PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote: > > hi, Shakeel, hi, Qi, > > > > #2: when we test above patch, we found the server easy to crash while running > > tests. we try to run up to 20 times, only 2 of them run successfully (above > > 37739220 is just the average data from these 2 runs, since the data is stable, > > we think maybe it's ok to report to you with this data). > > we also noticed for [1] there is a [syzbot ci] report in [2]. since we don't > > have serial output for our test server in this report which is for performance > > tests, we cannot say if other 18 runs failed due to similar reason. just FYI. > > > > The syzbot report is simply a rcu warning which will be fixed in v2. Do you > have more details on the crash you are seeing? Is it page counter underflow > warning? > > Thanks again for the help. Hi Oliver, it seems like sashiko found another issue with v2, so, if you have not yet started the test, you can skip it. Also I am rethinking the approach, so I will send a prototype in response on this email for which I will need your help in testing.