From: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] mm/slab, kfence, memcg: completely remove obj_ext for kfence objects
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 20:41:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <amtGQIpVU4WoWiXf@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727-b4-objext_split-v3-13-c29ef0f1f257@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 02:54:07PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> We have already disabled memory allocation profiling for objects
> allocated for KFENCE to avoid complexity. KFENCE allocations are rare
> and there can be only CONFIG_KFENCE_NUM_OBJECTS (default to 255)
> outstanding ones at any time, so they are among noise in the profiling
> stats.
>
> For the same reasons, we can stop memcg_kmem accounting of kfence
> objects as their memory usage will be negligible wrt any practical
> memcg limits.
>
> This allows us simplifying the code and getting rid of
> is_kfence_address() checks in various places, including slab_obj_ext()'s
> usage of obj_to_index(). Instead we rely on the fact that slab_obj_exts()
> will now always return 0 for a kfence object's fake slab, which makes
> those places unreachable.
>
> All we need to do to keep this assumption valid is not to allocate
> obj_exts for kfence objects, so the checks need to guard
> alloc_slab_obj_exts() where necessary.
>
> Suggested-by: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
--
Thanks,
Hao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 12:53 [PATCH v3 00/13] mm/slab, alloc_tag: reduce obj_ext memory waste Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-27 12:53 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] mm/slab: skip kfence objects in allocation profiling Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-30 11:16 ` Hao Li
2026-07-27 12:53 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] mm/slab: remove objs_per_slab() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-30 11:22 ` Hao Li
2026-07-27 12:53 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] mm: move struct slabobj_ext to mm/slab.h Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-27 12:53 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] mm/slab: make slab_obj_ext() determine object index Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-27 12:53 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] mm/slab: abstract slabobj_ext.objcg access Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-28 13:24 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-28 13:25 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] mm/slab: abstract slabobj_ext.ref access Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-28 13:41 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-28 17:41 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-29 6:18 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-29 9:46 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] mm/slab: replace slab.stride with obj_exts_in_object Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-29 6:40 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-29 9:27 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] mm/slab: change struct slabobj_ext to a union Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-29 9:03 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-30 11:39 ` Hao Li
2026-07-30 11:58 ` Hao Li
2026-07-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] mm/slab: introduce slab_obj_ext_has_codetag() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-30 11:42 ` Hao Li
2026-07-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] mm/slab: reduce slabobj_ext memory with allocation profiling disabled Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-27 14:07 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-30 11:59 ` Hao Li
2026-07-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] mm/slab: add cache_ and slab_needs_objcg() helpers Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] mm/slab: stop allocating objcg pointers when unnecessary Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-27 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] mm/slab, kfence, memcg: completely remove obj_ext for kfence objects Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-30 12:41 ` Hao Li [this message]
2026-07-28 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] mm/slab, alloc_tag: reduce obj_ext memory waste Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=amtGQIpVU4WoWiXf@fedora \
--to=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox