Linux cgroups development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
	Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Karl Erik Hofseth <karl.e.hofseth@opoint.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: keep folio's objcg same as its node
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 14:15:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anTPPr5hVV4aQLRD@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806165813.2526415-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>

On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 09:58:13AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> memcg_reparent_objcgs() has an inherent assumption that a folio's objcg
> is the objcg of the folio's node.  Folio migration across nodes breaks
> that assumption: the new folio simply inherits the old folio's objcg
> while living on a different node.
> 
> Once the assumption is broken, the reparenting of the folio's objcg and
> the reparenting of the folio's LRU list are no longer atomic.
> memcg_reparent_objcgs() handles one node per iteration and drops all the
> locks in between, so the objcg gets reparented in the iteration for the
> objcg's node while the LRU list gets spliced in the iteration for the
> folio's node.  Any LRU operation on that folio in between resolves its
> lruvec through the objcg, and thus takes the lru_lock of the wrong
> memcg, not the lru_lock of the list the folio is actually on.
> 
> Fix this by selecting the objcg by folio_nid() at charge time, and by
> re-deriving it for the destination node in mem_cgroup_migrate() and
> mem_cgroup_replace_folio().
> 
> Reported-by: Karl Erik Hofseth <karl.e.hofseth@opoint.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/anMmd1ADrDVwMO6v@work/
> Fixes: f1cf8d2f36dc ("mm: memcontrol: eliminate the problem of dying memory cgroup for LRU folios")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1: http://lore.kernel.org/20260806061830.3294679-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev
> 
> - In mem_cgroup_migrate, do obj_cgroup_put at the end (Sashiko)
> - Handle scenario where destination node has been reparented to the root but the
>   source node's objcg has not yet (Sashiko)
> - Add comment explaining the race between migration and reparenting (Johannes)
> 
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 3057396dda53..02c108cdd0f5 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2966,10 +2966,9 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_virt(void *p)
>  	return folio_memcg_check(virt_to_folio(p));
>  }
>  
> -static struct obj_cgroup *__get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +static struct obj_cgroup *__get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +						      int nid)
>  {
> -	int nid = numa_node_id();
> -
>  	for (; memcg; memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) {
>  		struct obj_cgroup *objcg = rcu_dereference(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->objcg);
>  
> @@ -2980,12 +2979,13 @@ static struct obj_cgroup *__get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static inline struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +static inline struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +							   int nid)
>  {
>  	struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> -	objcg = __get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(memcg);
> +	objcg = __get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(memcg, nid);
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  
>  	return objcg;
> @@ -3029,7 +3029,7 @@ static struct obj_cgroup *current_objcg_update(void)
>  
>  		rcu_read_lock();
>  		memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(current);
> -		objcg = __get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(memcg);
> +		objcg = __get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(memcg, numa_node_id());
>  		rcu_read_unlock();
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -5197,7 +5197,7 @@ static int charge_memcg(struct folio *folio, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
>  
> -	objcg = get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(memcg);
> +	objcg = get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(memcg, folio_nid(folio));
>  	/* Do not account at the root objcg level. */
>  	if (!obj_cgroup_is_root(objcg))
>  		ret = try_charge_memcg(memcg, gfp, folio_nr_pages(folio));
> @@ -5408,8 +5408,8 @@ void __mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(struct folio_batch *folios)
>   */
>  void mem_cgroup_replace_folio(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
>  {
> +	struct obj_cgroup *objcg, *new_objcg = NULL;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> -	struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
>  	long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(new);
>  
>  	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(old), old);
> @@ -5431,6 +5431,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_replace_folio(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  	memcg = obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg);
> +
>  	/* Force-charge the new page. The old one will be freed soon */
>  	if (!obj_cgroup_is_root(objcg)) {
>  		page_counter_charge(&memcg->memory, nr_pages);
> @@ -5438,7 +5439,31 @@ void mem_cgroup_replace_folio(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
>  			page_counter_charge(&memcg->memsw, nr_pages);
>  	}
>  
> -	obj_cgroup_get(objcg);
> +	/*
> +	 * memcg_reparent_objcgs() reparents a node's objcgs and its LRU lists
> +	 * together, under that node's lru_locks. If a folio's objcg is on a
> +	 * different node, the two happen in separate iterations with the locks
> +	 * dropped in between, and an LRU operation in that window takes the
> +	 * lru_lock of the wrong memcg. Keep the objcg on the folio's node.
> +	 */
> +	if (folio_nid(old) != folio_nid(new))
> +		new_objcg = __get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(memcg, folio_nid(new));
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * LRU folios are not accounted at the root level: swapping a non-root
> +	 * objcg for the root one would skip the uncharge and leak the charge.
> +	 * Keep the old one, the root memcg never reparents. No put needed,
> +	 * tryget takes no reference on the root objcg.
> +	 */
> +	if (new_objcg && obj_cgroup_is_root(new_objcg) &&
> +	    !obj_cgroup_is_root(objcg))
> +		new_objcg = NULL;

The two versions have quite some overlap. The refcounting is
different, but IMO that part is also hard to square.

How about a helper that always returns a referenced objcg?

static struct obj_cgroup *get_migration_objcg(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
{
	struct obj_cgroup *old_objcg, *new_objcg;
	int new_nid = folio_nid(new);
	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;

	old_objcg = get_obj_cgroup_from_folio(old);

	if (folio_nid(old) == new_nid)
		return old_objcg;

	memcg = obj_cgroup_memcg(old_objcg);
	new_objcg = __get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(memcg, new_nid);

	if (new_objcg && obj_cgroup_is_root(new_objcg) &&
	    !obj_cgroup_is_root(old_objcg))
		return old_objcg;

	obj_cgroup_put(old_objcg);

	return new_objcg;
}

In mem_cgroup_replace_folio(), this becomes:

	rcu_read_lock();

	... page counter update ...

	objcg = get_migration_objcg(old, new);
	commit_charge(new, objcg);
	memcg1_commit_charge(new, memcg);

	rcu_read_unlock();

> +
> +	if (new_objcg)
> +		objcg = new_objcg;
> +	else
> +		obj_cgroup_get(objcg);
> +
>  	commit_charge(new, objcg);
>  	memcg1_commit_charge(new, memcg);
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
> @@ -5457,7 +5482,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_replace_folio(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
>   */
>  void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
>  {
> -	struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
> +	struct obj_cgroup *objcg, *new_objcg = NULL;
>  
>  	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(old), old);
>  	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(new), new);
> @@ -5478,12 +5503,29 @@ void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
>  	if (!objcg)
>  		return;
>  
> -	/* Transfer the charge and the objcg ref */
> -	commit_charge(new, objcg);
> +	/* Keep the objcg on the folio's node, see mem_cgroup_replace_folio() */
> +	if (folio_nid(old) != folio_nid(new)) {
> +		rcu_read_lock();
> +		new_objcg = __get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg),
> +							folio_nid(new));
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +		/* No root swap, see mem_cgroup_replace_folio(). */
> +		if (new_objcg && obj_cgroup_is_root(new_objcg) &&
> +		    !obj_cgroup_is_root(objcg))
> +			new_objcg = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Transfer the charge and, unless it was swapped, the objcg ref */
> +	commit_charge(new, new_objcg ? : objcg);
>  
>  	/* Warning should never happen, so don't worry about refcount non-0 */
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_unqueue_deferred_split(old));
>  	old->memcg_data = 0;
> +
> +	/* @new took its own reference, drop @old's. */
> +	if (new_objcg)
> +		obj_cgroup_put(objcg);

And here it becomes:

	rcu_read_lock();
	objcg = get_migration_objcg(old, new);
	rcu_read_unlock();
	commit_charge(new, objcg);

	objcg = folio_objcg(old);
	old->memcg_data = 0;
	obj_cgroup_put(objcg);

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06 16:58 [PATCH v2] memcg: keep folio's objcg same as its node Shakeel Butt
2026-08-06 18:15 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2026-08-06 19:22   ` Johannes Weiner
2026-08-06 20:03     ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anTPPr5hVV4aQLRD@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=karl.e.hofseth@opoint.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox