From: Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>
To: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
"open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE CONTROLLER (MEMCG)"
<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:BPF [MISC]:Keyword:(?:b|_)bpf(?:b|_)"
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] mm/mglru: add tracepoint for scan_folios()
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 09:44:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aufrFRiP-PyWsCzs@bogon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261031090041.58574-6-ridong.chen@linux.dev>
On 10/31/26 at 05:00pm, Ridong Chen wrote:
> From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
>
> MGLRU's scan_folios() emits the classic-LRU tracepoint
> trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate(), which predates MGLRU. It reports the
> scan/isolate counts and the LRU type, but carries no generation or
> memcg context, so a trace of an MGLRU run cannot tell which memcg a
> given scan belongs to, nor how far reclaim has progressed through the
> generations.
>
> Add mm_mglru_scan_folios next to it, reporting the same counters plus
> nr_sorted (folios moved to a younger generation by sort_folio()) and
> the context the classic tracepoint lacks: the node id and memcg id of
> the lruvec, and the max_seq, tier and min_seq of the type being
> scanned.
>
> Now that struct scan_control is visible to the trace header, pass sc,
> lruvec, type and tier straight in and derive everything else in
> TP_fast_assign(), so nothing is computed at the call site when the
> event is disabled. The int fields are grouped at the end of the entry
> to avoid padding on 64-bit.
>
> scan_folios() is the MGLRU-specific layer where folios are actually
> scanned, so it has no classic-LRU counterpart. The existing tracepoint
> is left unchanged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> mm/trace_vmscan.h | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/vmscan.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/trace_vmscan.h b/mm/trace_vmscan.h
> index b2ad83e5f25e..8148b8224422 100644
> --- a/mm/trace_vmscan.h
> +++ b/mm/trace_vmscan.h
> @@ -392,6 +392,72 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
> __print_symbolic(__entry->lru, LRU_NAMES))
> );
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN
> +TRACE_EVENT(mm_mglru_scan_folios,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(struct lruvec *lruvec,
> + struct scan_control *sc,
> + unsigned long nr_requested,
> + unsigned long nr_scanned,
> + unsigned long nr_sorted,
> + unsigned long nr_skipped,
> + unsigned long nr_taken,
> + int type,
> + int tier),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(lruvec, sc, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_sorted, nr_skipped,
> + nr_taken, type, tier),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(u64, memcg_id)
> + __field(unsigned long, nr_requested)
> + __field(unsigned long, nr_scanned)
> + __field(unsigned long, nr_sorted)
> + __field(unsigned long, nr_skipped)
> + __field(unsigned long, nr_taken)
> + __field(unsigned long, max_seq)
> + __field(unsigned long, min_seq)
> + __field(int, nid)
Now it has nid printed out, it's cool.
This patch looks good to me, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>
> + __field(int, highest_zoneidx)
> + __field(int, order)
> + __field(int, lru)
> + __field(int, tier)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->memcg_id = mem_cgroup_id(lruvec_memcg(lruvec));
> + __entry->nr_requested = nr_requested;
> + __entry->nr_scanned = nr_scanned;
> + __entry->nr_sorted = nr_sorted;
> + __entry->nr_skipped = nr_skipped;
> + __entry->nr_taken = nr_taken;
> + __entry->max_seq = lruvec->lrugen.max_seq;
> + __entry->min_seq = lruvec->lrugen.min_seq[type];
> + __entry->nid = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec)->node_id;
> + __entry->highest_zoneidx = sc->reclaim_idx;
> + __entry->order = sc->order;
> + __entry->lru = type ? LRU_INACTIVE_FILE : LRU_INACTIVE_ANON;
> + __entry->tier = tier;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("nid=%d memcg_id=%llu classzone=%d order=%d nr_requested=%lu nr_scanned=%lu nr_sorted=%lu nr_skipped=%lu nr_taken=%lu lru=%s max_seq=%lu tier=%d min_seq=%lu",
> + __entry->nid,
> + __entry->memcg_id,
> + __entry->highest_zoneidx,
> + __entry->order,
> + __entry->nr_requested,
> + __entry->nr_scanned,
> + __entry->nr_sorted,
> + __entry->nr_skipped,
> + __entry->nr_taken,
> + __print_symbolic(__entry->lru, LRU_NAMES),
> + __entry->max_seq,
> + __entry->tier,
> + __entry->min_seq)
> +);
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_LRU_GEN */
> +
> TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_write_folio,
>
> TP_PROTO(struct folio *folio),
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 15e9184a580a..ff51fee872f8 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -4852,6 +4852,8 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate(sc, nr_to_scan,
> scanned, skipped, isolated,
> type ? LRU_INACTIVE_FILE : LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
> + trace_mm_mglru_scan_folios(lruvec, sc, nr_to_scan, scanned, sorted,
> + skipped, isolated, type, tier);
>
> *isolatedp = isolated;
> return scanned;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-31 9:00 [PATCH v5 0/6] mm/vmscan: move tracepoints to mm/ and add MGLRU tracepoints Ridong Chen
2026-10-31 9:00 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] mm/memcontrol: drop unused vmscan tracepoint include Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 3:20 ` Baoquan He
2026-10-31 9:00 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] mm/vmscan: move vmscan tracepoints to a local header Ridong Chen
2026-10-31 9:27 ` Muchun Song
2026-11-02 1:37 ` Baoquan He
2026-11-02 10:46 ` Ridong Chen
2026-10-31 9:00 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] mm/vmscan: move struct scan_control to a dedicated header Ridong Chen
2026-10-31 9:29 ` Muchun Song
2026-11-02 1:38 ` Baoquan He
2026-10-31 9:00 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] mm/vmscan: pass scan_control to the vmscan tracepoints Ridong Chen
2026-10-31 10:12 ` Muchun Song
2026-11-02 1:40 ` Baoquan He
2026-10-31 9:00 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] mm/mglru: add tracepoint for scan_folios() Ridong Chen
2026-10-31 21:02 ` Barry Song
2026-11-02 1:44 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2026-10-31 9:00 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] mm/mglru: add tracepoint for inc_max_seq() Ridong Chen
2026-10-31 21:21 ` Barry Song
2026-11-02 2:13 ` Baoquan He
2026-11-02 11:22 ` Ridong Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aufrFRiP-PyWsCzs@bogon \
--to=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox