From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Waiman Long Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] memcg: Enable fine-grained per process memory control Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:30:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20200817140831.30260-1-longman@redhat.com> <20200818091453.GL2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200818092737.GA148695@chrisdown.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1597779011; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TzOEgoxnjJc+44XQtv3kAPBEJXFL3VlSz++wwm59Khc=; b=bQZrn8stH9h3pMfBCJVUXeTQnSdzdkfWOcXZo73QR9MsSPF5UZfMBOxXC6dGXZ/4wuPKx5 ipUUwtKSgh5JJ5u0aPZn85IohTCf9cOI2LNktbTLgO+fM97MsgDzDThMVczURFaQ8RYMHB KnAPmWo9VUV1025q6meM9xnQ7kH5dbw= In-Reply-To: <20200818092737.GA148695@chrisdown.name> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Chris Down , peterz@infradead.org Cc: Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , Jonathan Corbet , Alexey Dobriyan , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On 8/18/20 5:27 AM, Chris Down wrote: > peterz@infradead.org writes: >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:08:23AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >>> Memory controller can be used to control and limit the amount of >>> physical memory used by a task. When a limit is set in "memory.high" in >>> a v2 non-root memory cgroup, the memory controller will try to reclaim >>> memory if the limit has been exceeded. Normally, that will be enough >>> to keep the physical memory consumption of tasks in the memory cgroup >>> to be around or below the "memory.high" limit. >>> >>> Sometimes, memory reclaim may not be able to recover memory in a rate >>> that can catch up to the physical memory allocation rate. In this case, >>> the physical memory consumption will keep on increasing. >> >> Then slow down the allocator? That's what we do for dirty pages too, we >> slow down the dirtier when we run against the limits. > > We already do that since v5.4. I'm wondering whether Waiman's customer > is just running with a too-old kernel without 0e4b01df865 ("mm, memcg: > throttle allocators when failing reclaim over memory.high") backported. > The fact is that we don't have that in RHEL8 yet and cgroup v2 is still not the default at the moment. I am planning to backport the throttling patches to RHEL and hopefully can switch to use cgroup v2 soon. Cheers, Longman