From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>,
xuejiufei
<jiufei.xue-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>,
Caspar Zhang
<caspar-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>,
linux-block <linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-throttle: fix race between blkcg_bio_issue_check and cgroup_rmdir
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:29:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b590caed-1423-4776-966d-cd9e346a8ea1@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180207213811.GF695913-4dN5La/x3IkLX0oZNxdnEQ2O0Ztt9esIQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
Hi Tejun,
Thanks very much for reviewing this patch.
On 18/2/8 05:38, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Joseph.
>
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 04:40:02PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
>> writeback kworker
>> blkcg_bio_issue_check
>> rcu_read_lock
>> blkg_lookup
>> <<< *race window*
>> blk_throtl_bio
>> spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock)
>> spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock)
>> rcu_read_unlock
>>
>> cgroup_rmdir
>> cgroup_destroy_locked
>> kill_css
>> css_killed_ref_fn
>> css_killed_work_fn
>> offline_css
>> blkcg_css_offline
>> spin_trylock(q->queue_lock)
>> blkg_destroy
>> spin_unlock(q->queue_lock)
>
> Ah, right. Thanks for spotting the bug.
>
>> Since rcu can only prevent blkg from releasing when it is being used,
>> the blkg->refcnt can be decreased to 0 during blkg_destroy and schedule
>> blkg release.
>> Then trying to blkg_get in blk_throtl_bio will complains the WARNING.
>> And then the corresponding blkg_put will schedule blkg release again,
>> which result in double free.
>> This race is introduced by commit ae1188963611 ("blkcg: consolidate blkg
>> creation in blkcg_bio_issue_check()"). Before this commit, it will lookup
>> first and then try to lookup/create again with queue_lock. So revive
>> this logic to fix the race.
>
> The change seems a bit drastic to me. Can't we do something like the
> following instead?
>
> blk_throtl_bio()
> {
> ... non throttled cases ...
>
> /* out-of-limit, queue to @tg */
>
> /*
> * We can look up and retry but the race window is tiny here.
> * Just letting it through should be good enough.
> */
> if (!css_tryget(blkcg->css))
> goto out;
>
> ... actual queueing ...
> css_put(blkcg->css);
> ...
> }
So you mean checking css->refcnt to prevent the further use of
blkg_get? I think it makes sense.
IMO, we should use css_tryget_online instead, and rightly after taking
queue_lock. Because there may be more use of blkg_get in blk_throtl_bio
in the futher. Actually it already has two now. One is in
blk_throtl_assoc_bio, and the other is in throtl_qnode_add_bio.
What do you think of this?
Thanks,
Joseph
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-08 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-07 8:40 [PATCH v2] blk-throttle: fix race between blkcg_bio_issue_check and cgroup_rmdir Joseph Qi
[not found] ` <6f136c90-faa9-4bc0-b02f-3a112b4d8360-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-07 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20180207213811.GF695913-4dN5La/x3IkLX0oZNxdnEQ2O0Ztt9esIQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-08 2:29 ` Joseph Qi [this message]
[not found] ` <b590caed-1423-4776-966d-cd9e346a8ea1-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-08 15:23 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-09 2:15 ` Joseph Qi
[not found] ` <aac95b90-786d-95bf-b93d-87ecca79f846-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-12 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b590caed-1423-4776-966d-cd9e346a8ea1@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=joseph.qi-kpsofbns7gizrge5brqyagc/g2k4zdhf@public.gmane.org \
--cc=axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=caspar-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jiufei.xue-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox