Re: [PATCH -next] cgroup/cpuset: Statically initialize more members of top_cpuset

[Klara Modin <klarasmodin@gmail.com>]

On 2024-04-23 21:50, Waiman Long wrote:
> 
> On 4/23/24 15:21, Klara Modin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2024-04-20 11:46, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
>>> Initializing top_cpuset.relax_domain_level and setting
>>> CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE to top_cpuset.flags in cpuset_init() could be
>>> completed at the time of top_cpuset definition by compiler.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 5 ++---
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>>> index d8d3439eda4e..e70008a1d86a 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>>> @@ -369,8 +369,9 @@ static inline void notify_partition_change(struct 
>>> cpuset *cs, int old_prs)
>>>     static struct cpuset top_cpuset = {
>>>       .flags = ((1 << CS_ONLINE) | (1 << CS_CPU_EXCLUSIVE) |
>>> -          (1 << CS_MEM_EXCLUSIVE)),
>>> +          (1 << CS_MEM_EXCLUSIVE) | (1 < CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE)),
>>
>> You dropped a '<' for the bitwise shift, this causes bad cpu 
>> utilization for me.
> 
> Oh, now load_balancing is disable by default in the root cgroup. That is 
> bad. Will post a patch to fix it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Longman
> 
I attached one in my previous message, though I'm still very new at this 
and may have missed something.

Regards,
Klara Modin