From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] sched/core: Skip user_cpus_ptr masking if no online CPU left
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:53:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd8413ea-bdfe-4bc3-a3d0-aed6e4c576e5@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251029212724.1005063-1-longman@redhat.com>
On 2025/10/30 5:27, Waiman Long wrote:
> Chen Ridong reported that cpuset could report a kernel warning for a task
> due to set_cpus_allowed_ptr() returning failure in the corner case that:
>
> 1) the task used sched_setaffinity(2) to set its CPU affinity mask to
> be the same as the cpuset.cpus of its cpuset,
> 2) all the CPUs assigned to that cpuset were taken offline, and
> 3) cpuset v1 is in use and the task had to be migrated to top_cpuset.
> Task migration is not needed for cpuset v2.
>
> Due to the fact that CPU affinity of the tasks in the top cpuset are
> not updated when a CPU hotplug online/offline event happens, offline
> CPUs are included in CPU affinity of those tasks. It is possible
> that further masking with user_cpus_ptr set by sched_setaffinity(2)
> in __set_cpus_allowed_ptr() will leave only offline CPUs in the new
> mask causing the subsequent call to __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked()
> to return failure with an empty CPU affinity.
>
> Fix this failure by skipping user_cpus_ptr masking if there is no online
> CPU left.
>
> Reported-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250714032311.3570157-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com/
> Fixes: da019032819a ("sched: Enforce user requested affinity")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index f1ebf67b48e2..66cd21582822 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3146,12 +3146,13 @@ int __set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, struct affinity_context *ctx)
>
> rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
> /*
> - * Masking should be skipped if SCA_USER or any of the SCA_MIGRATE_*
> - * flags are set.
> + * Masking should be skipped if SCA_USER, any of the SCA_MIGRATE_*
> + * flags are set or no online CPU left.
> */
> if (p->user_cpus_ptr &&
> !(ctx->flags & (SCA_USER | SCA_MIGRATE_ENABLE | SCA_MIGRATE_DISABLE)) &&
> - cpumask_and(rq->scratch_mask, ctx->new_mask, p->user_cpus_ptr))
> + cpumask_and(rq->scratch_mask, ctx->new_mask, p->user_cpus_ptr) &&
> + cpumask_intersects(rq->scratch_mask, cpu_active_mask))
> ctx->new_mask = rq->scratch_mask;
>
> return __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked(p, ctx, rq, &rf);
This patch have been tested with our test project.
Reviewed-by: Chen Ridong<chenridong@huawei.com>
--
Best regards,
Ridong
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-31 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-18 16:41 [PATCH v2] sched/core: Mask out offline CPUs when user_cpus_ptr is used Waiman Long
2025-07-18 16:44 ` Waiman Long
2025-07-18 16:48 ` [PATCH v3] sched/core: Skip user_cpus_ptr masking if no online CPU left Waiman Long
2025-07-21 15:13 ` Michal Koutný
2025-07-21 15:28 ` Waiman Long
2025-08-26 14:25 ` Michal Koutný
2025-08-26 16:06 ` Waiman Long
2025-07-23 1:58 ` Chen Ridong
2025-07-31 12:03 ` Chen Ridong
2025-08-14 1:14 ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-29 21:27 ` [RESEND PATCH " Waiman Long
2025-10-30 10:56 ` Michal Koutný
2025-10-31 0:53 ` Chen Ridong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd8413ea-bdfe-4bc3-a3d0-aed6e4c576e5@huaweicloud.com \
--to=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).