From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Waiman Long Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, memcg: Don't put offlined memcg into local stock Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:15:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20211001190938.14050-1-longman@redhat.com> <20211001190938.14050-2-longman@redhat.com> <95ba1931-e9c9-45c3-b080-d28f2ad368a7@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1643649328; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=517osVusanMuP0Y4/rkshkWytofYaoASsE2dV7IDjz4=; b=GQoIFbBRWeiRf4N9CsF7PdyA0eHlVE0YH4YINazUsLg4a7bkjpLgZF3NFAMlskNnqT162r E2eoG6s0dx7uYIBUn1CIgvlylD2reMkd7hvr8CyfbQEBfN56xPixSd5sXU1Y4sWiWycTKm HOozRL7UumCIGKepaPq4mst2yEZa4Eg= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <95ba1931-e9c9-45c3-b080-d28f2ad368a7@redhat.com> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Roman Gushchin Cc: Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Shakeel Butt , Muchun Song On 1/31/22 12:09, Waiman Long wrote: > On 1/31/22 12:01, Roman Gushchin wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 10:55:56PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: >>> On 10/1/21 19:51, Roman Gushchin wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 03:09:36PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >>>>> When freeing a page associated with an offlined memcg, refill_stock() >>>>> will put it into local stock delaying its demise until another memcg >>>>> comes in to take its place in the stock. To avoid that, we now check >>>>> for offlined memcg and go directly in this case to the slowpath for >>>>> the uncharge via the repurposed cancel_charge() function. >>>> Hi Waiman! >>>> >>>> I'm afraid it can make a cleanup of a dying cgroup slower: for every >>>> released page we'll potentially traverse the whole cgroup tree and >>>> decrease atomic page counters. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure I understand the benefits we get from this change which >>>> do justify the slowdown on the cleanup path. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>> I was notified of a lockdep splat that this patch may help to prevent. >> Would you mind to test this patch: >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/cgroups/msg31244.html ? >> >> It should address this dependency. > > Thanks for the pointer. I believe that your patch should be able to > address this circular locking dependency. > > Feel free to add my > > Reviewed-by: Waiman Long BTW, have you posted it to lkml? If not, would you mind doing so? Thanks, Longman