From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Waiman Long Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: Flush stats before releasing blkcg_gq Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 00:10:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20230524011935.719659-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1684901459; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+jjXC8nEHxswkc61Y0uyyoGWYpO1Pad3VdwaQeUusRw=; b=Z/1lLEL4bHQc1bXDWh3DKM4Duq/gTAbMPIUaK3KPNfJQY2w+CsGMzDPXZKOCssS2E6vaGV cEuhOcAiG6kJ8jB88qciZXa/PGKGT8UslfTa5/CYdbHx409zpUA6Qu75ZrriXtzWL505CO B4vFRAMbgkmXl6HURcHEHOu7wNRD0mc= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed" To: Ming Lei , Yosry Ahmed Cc: Linux-MM , Michal Hocko , Shakeel Butt , Johannes Weiner , Roman Gushchin , Muchun Song , Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , mkoutny@suse.com On 5/23/23 22:37, Ming Lei wrote: > Hi Yosry, > > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 07:06:38PM -0700, Yosry Ahmed wrote: >> Hi Ming, >> >> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 6:21=E2=80=AFPM Ming Lei w= rote: >>> As noted by Michal, the blkg_iostat_set's in the lockless list >>> hold reference to blkg's to protect against their removal. Those >>> blkg's hold reference to blkcg. When a cgroup is being destroyed, >>> cgroup_rstat_flush() is only called at css_release_work_fn() which >>> is called when the blkcg reference count reaches 0. This circular >>> dependency will prevent blkcg and some blkgs from being freed after >>> they are made offline. >> I am not at all familiar with blkcg, but does calling >> cgroup_rstat_flush() in offline_css() fix the problem? > Except for offline, this list needs to be flushed after the associated di= sk > is deleted. > >> or can items be >> added to the lockless list(s) after the blkcg is offlined? > Yeah. > > percpu_ref_*get(&blkg->refcnt) still can succeed after the percpu refcnt > is killed in blkg_destroy() which is called from both offline css and > removing disk. As suggested by Tejun, we can use percpu_ref_tryget(&blkg->refcnt) to=20 make sure that we can only take a reference when the blkg is online. I=20 think it is a bit safer to take a percpu refcnt to avoid use after free.=20 My other concern about your patch is that the per cpu list iterations=20 will be done multiple times when a blkcg is destroyed if many blkgs are=20 attached to the blkcg. I still prefer to do it once in=20 blkcg_destroy_blkgs(). I am going to post an updated version tomorrow=20 after some more testings. Cheers, Longman