From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jing-Ting Wu Subject: Re: [Bug] race condition at rebind_subsystems() Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2022 14:58:50 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1978e209e71905d89651e61abd07285912d412a1.camel@mediatek.com> <20220715115938.GA8646@blackbody.suse.cz> <20220719133512.GD897@blackbody.suse.cz> <98d738ec5d7d32441f6e62278fff32201fd948de.camel@mediatek.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=M95TLiNkwsL0QeZAeys9UAP5FWDjNm0kDQVp7WcThws=; b=Flz3Q0i7aGu6lCgW8bJADz/8LXyU4dgAggJHbd18fbZAsbukKzOs25mm4c0RLAEQ9WfEGz59YC3roqCUqjl0XdhH0nRjnk9/cno5J8azRbDcrHlNhkrf6uDVyrQS+h8KMWvSo8t+p26YRhB/xShZTPQbEzutHGDAFsB18nRmwn0=; In-Reply-To: <98d738ec5d7d32441f6e62278fff32201fd948de.camel-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Michal =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= Cc: Tejun Heo , Johannes Weiner , Zefan Li , Matthias Brugger , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Shakeel Butt , wsd_upstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, lixiong.liu-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, wenju.xu-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, jonathan.jmchen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org On Thu, 2022-07-21 at 14:46 +0800, Jing-Ting Wu wrote: > On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 15:35 +0200, Michal Koutn=C3=BD wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 03:44:21PM +0800, Jing-Ting Wu < > > jing-ting.wu-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > Accroding your description, is the following patch corrent? > >=20 > > Yes, this is what I meant (i.e. grace period before invalidating > > the > > removed rstat_css_node). > >=20 > > > If the patch is correct, we will add this patch to our stability > > > test. > > > And we will continue to observe whether the problem is solved. > >=20 > > It'd be great to have such confirmation. >=20 > Thanks for confirm the patch. > We already add patch to our stability test. > We will reply mail if we have any update. >=20 > >=20 > > Thanks, > > Michal >=20 Hi, Michal Use the patch of previous mail, we pass the stability test at previous two week and still testing. I think the patch is helpful to the syndrome. It passed stability test over two week so far. (as-is: < one week failed) Do you help to upstream this patch to mainline? Thank you. Best regards, Jing-Ting Wu >=20 > Best regards, > Jing-Ting Wu