From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix potential race in dl_add_task_root_domain()
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 23:31:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd61a698-a298-4038-a4d9-a40ffe0b05d6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251124033415.10784-1-piliu@redhat.com>
On 11/23/25 10:34 PM, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> The access rule for local_cpu_mask_dl requires it to be called on the
> local CPU with preemption disabled. However, dl_add_task_root_domain()
> currently violates this rule.
>
> Without preemption disabled, the following race can occur:
>
> 1. ThreadA calls dl_add_task_root_domain() on CPU 0
> 2. Gets pointer to CPU 0's local_cpu_mask_dl
> 3. ThreadA is preempted and migrated to CPU 1
> 4. ThreadA continues using CPU 0's local_cpu_mask_dl
> 5. Meanwhile, the scheduler on CPU 0 calls find_later_rq() which also
> uses local_cpu_mask_dl (with preemption properly disabled)
> 6. Both contexts now corrupt the same per-CPU buffer concurrently
>
> Fix this by moving the local_cpu_mask_dl access to the preemption
> disabled section.
>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aSBjm3mN_uIy64nz@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb
> Fixes: 318e18ed22e8 ("sched/deadline: Walk up cpuset hierarchy to decide root domain when hot-unplug")
> Reported-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>
> To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> Cc: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> To: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 194a341e85864..e9153e86de0a7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -2944,7 +2944,7 @@ void dl_add_task_root_domain(struct task_struct *p)
> struct rq *rq;
> struct dl_bw *dl_b;
> unsigned int cpu;
> - struct cpumask *msk = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_cpu_mask_dl);
> + struct cpumask *msk;
>
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, rf.flags);
> if (!dl_task(p) || dl_entity_is_special(&p->dl)) {
> @@ -2952,6 +2952,7 @@ void dl_add_task_root_domain(struct task_struct *p)
> return;
> }
>
> + msk = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_cpu_mask_dl);
> /*
> * Get an active rq, whose rq->rd traces the correct root
> * domain.
It will be clearerer by moving the statement down to before the
dl_get_task_effective_cpus() call that uses msk. Please also update the
comment as suggested by Juri.
Thanks,
Longman
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-24 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251119095525.12019-3-piliu@redhat.com>
2025-11-24 3:34 ` [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix potential race in dl_add_task_root_domain() Pingfan Liu
2025-11-24 4:31 ` Waiman Long [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd61a698-a298-4038-a4d9-a40ffe0b05d6@redhat.com \
--to=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=piliu@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).