From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
hch@infradead.org, colyli@kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
tieren@fnnas.com, axboe@kernel.dk, tj@kernel.org,
josef@toxicpanda.com, song@kernel.org, kmo@daterainc.com,
satyat@google.com, ebiggers@google.com, neil@brown.name,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
johnny.chenyi@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 06/15] md/raid0: convert raid0_handle_discard() to use bio_submit_split_bioset()
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 15:57:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f940eac3-bfd9-596d-0349-6d5e9738cdfe@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa6b1a62-787e-4365-aca5-d03c6b94545f@kernel.org>
Hi,
在 2025/09/01 14:37, Damien Le Moal 写道:
> On 9/1/25 12:32 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>>
>> Unify bio split code, and prepare to fix disordered split IO
>
> Missing the period at the end of the above sentence.
>
>>
>> Noted commit 319ff40a5427 ("md/raid0: Fix performance regression for large
>> sequential writes") already fix disordered split IO by converting bio to
>> underlying disks before submit_bio_noacct(), with the respect
>> md_submit_bio() already split by sectors, and raid0_make_request() will
>> split at most once for unaligned IO. This is a bit hacky and we'll convert
>> this to solution in general later.
>
> I do not see how this is relevant to this patch. The patch is a simple
> straightforward conversion of hard-coded BIO split to using
> bio_submit_split_bioset(). So I would just say that.
This is just a note that why bio_split() from read/write is not
converted now, because disordered problem is fixed by above commit
already.
Later patch 15 will convert bio_split() from read/write.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> With the above addressed, this looks OK to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
>
Thanks,
Kuai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-01 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-01 3:32 [PATCH RFC v3 00/15] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/15] block: cleanup bio_issue Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:43 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-01 6:22 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/15] block: add QUEUE_FLAG_BIO_ISSUE Yu Kuai
2025-09-02 17:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-03 0:54 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-03 16:54 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/15] md: fix mssing blktrace bio split events Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:30 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-01 7:53 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/15] blk-crypto: fix missing processing for split bio Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:31 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-03 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/15] block: factor out a helper bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:34 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-02 17:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-03 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-03 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/15] md/raid0: convert raid0_handle_discard() to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:37 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-01 7:57 ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2025-09-03 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 07/15] md/raid1: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:43 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-01 8:03 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/15] md/raid10: add a new r10bio flag R10BIO_Returned Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/15] md/raid10: convert read/write to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/15] md/raid5: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 11/15] md/md-linear: " Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 17:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 12/15] blk-crypto: " Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 13/15] block: skip unnecessary checks for split bio Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-03 17:00 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 14/15] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-09-02 17:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-03 1:00 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 1:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-03 1:41 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-03 16:59 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 17:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 15/15] md/raid0: convert raid0_make_request() to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 14:09 ` [PATCH RFC v3 00/15] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Bart Van Assche
2025-09-02 1:50 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-02 8:04 ` Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f940eac3-bfd9-596d-0349-6d5e9738cdfe@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=colyli@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=johnny.chenyi@huawei.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=satyat@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tieren@fnnas.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).