From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com [185.125.188.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AEAD7A for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDA3F407C6 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:09:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1645600181; bh=nimhNkIt7mdxahM9C8qO53ZAeN7FCRJYbKKsVkt4SHg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=h22+cI+gAEjcbUMBp5foBzMgjpbik0QosKLk8iA6qSbP193D3ZB7Ch+BKmCelnwWZ KWPZZckeyOOtt9zTioOo8u38Vi1w+M9xCTwa2QrlIldjVrSitzbnqcq8qMR91DBKjL zey3nC/jSa5bJfz0e/0HuR/Mx2aVEB683H0aYYk4YEvNR9HTzdy390LU/OxOk5K9hG 9DEVtMqzMHH1rLhPQThZfmPfe8dfzsFtNBk0chsdMN5V4eH44uFIGqHyxsorynKIGg zsHX8C/juRLqSHrR0jnDaJ1Us1XF6MSZpLCBaCX+pPtQsAlv4/6Um/ChLKKYKROqW+ XqHsOhBq4KgpQ== Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id o5-20020a50c905000000b00410effbf65dso13144015edh.17 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 23:09:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nimhNkIt7mdxahM9C8qO53ZAeN7FCRJYbKKsVkt4SHg=; b=DgmOr7A+wDWq/nhhzorzmJvjmy8h6gMfbGjtbZAv2qC6QQ+BrkWXiq84FLHh3GcSHu WTic/kXjpZwQaPA++lbxXmPD0vfTebd/b7giX/mCJirnTPjn4C4VnIzHgv4eqIU6AM8l +jrY72gLWctoHPraqM8wdc9VAZKkMXEy6oXPioBP/pnDIKFKs7PVDMQSkA0/ajDsIdwD pXXrOv3MQ9Mo5iLz8SoRw2lHZAPyw/0zuXt0Rj1kXDEWVzG1BWKsId5591zzqGe2unAV dIlmgwQ9RoONshGoYB72LmPZoTtZUTUlYR8QnnwBABzE8XUeBfACbrczO+NvKGiilAcr FCUA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531uFwn7U/nULqSpBZKBEkusjnWYJUtdjmAYEVeHk1p9e/0C8pw9 YPndKkWJpAVnD1gRHivezXQmMoKFbdBetbxOenlqEt9XAsKCHJiGEqdx5Ff7KeAHxp4+zMXDjC/ HzQA22/SGa3e53u6QVqZcR4uJGSODGXnQuRYhhIwWc8vvSQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dd9a:0:b0:410:b875:ab95 with SMTP id g26-20020aa7dd9a000000b00410b875ab95mr29494445edv.248.1645600181672; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 23:09:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyzCfvOZRfs9gbRYzkE2QJAiHsybZmRR4vAzmtPrnH3egKFJYppepwp/EaGxvawIkcSpK6J/A== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dd9a:0:b0:410:b875:ab95 with SMTP id g26-20020aa7dd9a000000b00410b875ab95mr29494428edv.248.1645600181505; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 23:09:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.124] (xdsl-188-155-181-108.adslplus.ch. [188.155.181.108]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kw5sm7198688ejc.140.2022.02.22.23.09.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 23:09:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <18bdf4ae-c445-ad10-b344-324436cbe445@canonical.com> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:09:39 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/4] mfd/pwm: dt-bindings: google, cros-ec: include generic pwm schema Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=c3=b6nig?= , Heiko Stuebner Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Douglas Anderson , Lee Jones , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Benson Leung , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Thierry Reding , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Andy Gross , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , Guenter Roeck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220214081916.162014-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <164557235424.1264579.14486504733557463529.b4-ty@sntech.de> <20220223062233.4m2xejozz4d47gmo@pengutronix.de> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20220223062233.4m2xejozz4d47gmo@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 23/02/2022 07:22, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:27:08AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: >> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:12 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> DTS patches are independent. Not tested, but I really hope no downstream kernel >>> depends on pwm node naming... If it does, please change it to compatible. :) >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Krzysztof >>> >>> Krzysztof Kozlowski (4): >>> dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema >>> arm64: dts: mt8183: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema >>> arm64: dts: qcom: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema >>> arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema >>> >>> [...] >> >> Applied, thanks! >> >> [4/4] arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema >> commit: 474a84be692d893f45a54b405dcbc137cbf77949 > > I expected that all patches in this series go in together via an ARM > tree. Or are there expectations that this goes via PWM? I would propose to pick individual patches by each maintainer. bindings by PWM tree (Rob acked it) and DTS via each SoC tree. Such approach gives flexibility, although `make dtbs_check` will spot the new errors when run in PWM tree. Next will be fine, though. Best regards, Krzysztof