From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Cc: bleung@chromium.org, dawidn@google.com,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] platform/chrome: Introduce cros_ec_device_alloc()
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 12:36:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025072428-marathon-anemia-c9f6@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aIIDz_qtbRjZB8Sg@google.com>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 09:58:39AM +0000, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 08:15:07AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 04:44:53AM +0000, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> > > Prepare to decouple the lifecycle of struct cros_ec_device from specific
> > > device by introducing a kref.
> >
> > Ick, are you sure? This is a device, so use struct device for it.
> > That's what it is there for.
> >
> > So shouldn't this be its own 'struct device' and let the driver core
> > handle it correctly instead of trying to have a "child" structure with a
> > reference count that is not shown in sysfs at all?
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> To make sure I understand, do the following patches (draft and simplified) make
> sense? Short summary:
> - cros_ec_device_alloc() allocates resources and setup the destructor.
> - cros_ec_register() adds the device to the device hierarchy.
> - cros_ec_unregister() removes the device.
> - cros_ec_chardev_open() gets a refcount of the device.
> - cros_ec_chardev_release() puts the refcount.
NEVER attempt to increment/decrement refcounts on open/release. That
way lies madness and should not be needed at all, the underlying
infrastructure should keep things working properly here, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-24 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-21 4:44 [PATCH v3 0/8] platform/chrome: cros_ec_chardev: Fix a possible UAF Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-07-21 4:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] platform/chrome: cros_ec_chardev: Remove redundant struct field Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-07-21 4:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] platform/chrome: cros_ec: Unregister notifier in cros_ec_unregister() Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-07-21 6:13 ` Greg KH
2025-07-21 9:30 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-07-21 4:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] platform/chrome: cros_ec_chardev: Decouple fops from struct cros_ec_dev Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-07-21 4:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] platform/chrome: Disallow sending commands through unregistered ec_dev Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-07-21 5:47 ` Greg KH
2025-07-21 9:31 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-07-21 10:23 ` Greg KH
2025-07-21 4:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] platform/chrome: Introduce cros_ec_device_alloc() Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-07-21 6:15 ` Greg KH
2025-07-24 9:58 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-07-24 10:36 ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-07-24 13:32 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-07-25 4:58 ` Greg KH
2025-08-01 7:25 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-08-01 8:22 ` Greg KH
2025-08-01 8:41 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-08-01 8:50 ` Greg KH
2025-08-14 9:24 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-07-21 4:44 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] platform/chrome: Don't initialize common utilities when registering Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-07-21 4:44 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] platform/chrome: cros_ec_chardev: Hold refcount of struct cros_ec_device Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-07-21 4:44 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] platform/chrome: Manage struct cros_ec_device lifecycle by its refcount Tzung-Bi Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025072428-marathon-anemia-c9f6@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dawidn@google.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox