From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>, Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, tzungbi@kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/11] gpio: Leverage revocable for accessing struct gpio_chip
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:29:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260213092958.864411-11-tzungbi@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260213092958.864411-1-tzungbi@kernel.org>
Struct gpio_device now provides a revocable provider to the underlying
struct gpio_chip. Leverage revocable for accessing the struct
gpio_chip.
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
---
v3:
- Change revocable API usages accordingly.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260203061059.975605-11-tzungbi@kernel.org
- Separate from v1(a) for excluding gpio_chip_guard and combine v1(b).
v1(a):
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260116081036.352286-23-tzungbi@kernel.org
v1(b):
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260116081036.352286-19-tzungbi@kernel.org
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 60 +++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 34f2665a9311..2ba78add3417 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -338,7 +338,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_device_get_label);
*/
struct gpio_chip *gpio_device_get_chip(struct gpio_device *gdev)
{
- return rcu_dereference_check(gdev->chip, 1);
+ struct gpio_chip *gc;
+
+ revocable_try_access_with(gdev->chip_rp, gc);
+ return gc;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_device_get_chip);
@@ -556,9 +559,7 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpio_name_to_desc(const char * const name)
list_for_each_entry_srcu(gdev, &gpio_devices, list,
srcu_read_lock_held(&gpio_devices_srcu)) {
- guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
-
- gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
+ revocable_try_access_with(gdev->chip_rp, gc);
if (!gc)
continue;
@@ -972,9 +973,7 @@ static void gpiochip_setup_devs(void)
list_for_each_entry_srcu(gdev, &gpio_devices, list,
srcu_read_lock_held(&gpio_devices_srcu)) {
- guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
-
- gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
+ revocable_try_access_with(gdev->chip_rp, gc);
if (!gc) {
dev_err(&gdev->dev, "Underlying GPIO chip is gone\n");
continue;
@@ -1378,11 +1377,11 @@ struct gpio_device *gpio_device_find(const void *data,
if (!device_is_registered(&gdev->dev))
continue;
- guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
-
- gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
+ revocable_try_access_with(gdev->chip_rp, gc);
+ if (!gc)
+ continue;
- if (gc && match(gc, data))
+ if (match(gc, data))
return gpio_device_get(gdev);
}
@@ -3310,18 +3309,10 @@ static int gpio_chip_get_value(struct gpio_chip *gc, const struct gpio_desc *des
static int gpiod_get_raw_value_commit(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- struct gpio_device *gdev;
struct gpio_chip *gc;
int value;
- /* FIXME Unable to use gpio_chip_guard due to const desc. */
- gdev = desc->gdev;
-
- guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
-
- gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
- if (!gc)
- return -ENODEV;
+ revocable_try_access_or_return(desc->gdev->chip_rp, gc);
value = gpio_chip_get_value(gc, desc);
value = value < 0 ? value : !!value;
@@ -3360,9 +3351,10 @@ static int gpio_chip_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
/* The 'other' chip must be protected with its GPIO device's SRCU. */
static bool gpio_device_chip_cmp(struct gpio_device *gdev, struct gpio_chip *gc)
{
- guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
+ struct gpio_chip *chip;
- return gc == srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
+ revocable_try_access_with(gdev->chip_rp, chip);
+ return chip ? chip == gc : false;
}
int gpiod_get_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
@@ -3385,11 +3377,7 @@ int gpiod_get_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
if (!can_sleep)
WARN_ON(array_info->gdev->can_sleep);
- guard(srcu)(&array_info->gdev->srcu);
- gc = srcu_dereference(array_info->gdev->chip,
- &array_info->gdev->srcu);
- if (!gc)
- return -ENODEV;
+ revocable_try_access_or_return(array_info->gdev->chip_rp, gc);
ret = gpio_chip_get_multiple(gc, array_info->get_mask,
value_bitmap);
@@ -3726,11 +3714,7 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
return -EPERM;
}
- guard(srcu)(&array_info->gdev->srcu);
- gc = srcu_dereference(array_info->gdev->chip,
- &array_info->gdev->srcu);
- if (!gc)
- return -ENODEV;
+ revocable_try_access_or_return(array_info->gdev->chip_rp, gc);
if (!raw && !bitmap_empty(array_info->invert_mask, array_size))
bitmap_xor(value_bitmap, value_bitmap,
@@ -4024,7 +4008,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_is_shared);
*/
int gpiod_to_irq(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- struct gpio_device *gdev;
struct gpio_chip *gc;
int offset;
int ret;
@@ -4033,12 +4016,7 @@ int gpiod_to_irq(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
if (ret <= 0)
return -EINVAL;
- gdev = desc->gdev;
- /* FIXME Cannot use gpio_chip_guard due to const desc. */
- guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
- gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
- if (!gc)
- return -ENODEV;
+ revocable_try_access_or_return(desc->gdev->chip_rp, gc);
offset = gpiod_hwgpio(desc);
if (gc->to_irq) {
@@ -5413,9 +5391,7 @@ static int gpiolib_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
if (priv->newline)
seq_putc(s, '\n');
- guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
-
- gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
+ revocable_try_access_with(gdev->chip_rp, gc);
if (!gc) {
seq_printf(s, "%s: (dangling chip)\n", dev_name(&gdev->dev));
return 0;
--
2.53.0.310.g728cabbaf7-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-13 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-13 9:29 [PATCH v3 00/11] gpio: Adopt revocable mechanism for UAF prevention Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] gpio: Access `gpio_bus_type` in gpiochip_setup_dev() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20 7:46 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] gpio: Remove redundant check for struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20 7:48 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] gpio: sysfs: " Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20 7:51 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-23 6:17 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] gpio: Ensure struct gpio_chip for gpiochip_setup_dev() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-18 10:24 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] gpio: cdev: Don't check struct gpio_chip in gpio_chrdev_open() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20 7:51 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] selftests: gpio: Add gpio-cdev-uaf tests Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20 7:52 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] gpio: Add revocable provider handle for struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-18 10:28 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] gpio: cdev: Leverage revocable for accessing " Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] gpio: Remove gpio_chip_guard by using revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13 9:29 ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] gpio: Remove unused `chip` and `srcu` in struct gpio_device Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-18 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] gpio: Adopt revocable mechanism for UAF prevention Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 6:21 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260213092958.864411-11-tzungbi@kernel.org \
--to=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox