public inbox for chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>, Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, tzungbi@kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/11] gpio: Remove unused `chip` and `srcu` in struct gpio_device
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:29:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260213092958.864411-12-tzungbi@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260213092958.864411-1-tzungbi@kernel.org>

`chip` and `srcu` in struct gpio_device are unused as their usages are
replaced to use revocable.  Remove them.

Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
---
v3:
- No changes.

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260203061059.975605-12-tzungbi@kernel.org
- No changes.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260116081036.352286-24-tzungbi@kernel.org

 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 26 +-------------------------
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h |  4 ----
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 2ba78add3417..01be9f6978f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -423,8 +423,6 @@ static int gpiochip_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	if (WARN_ON(!gc->get_direction))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
@@ -875,7 +873,6 @@ static void gpiodev_release(struct device *dev)
 	ida_free(&gpio_ida, gdev->id);
 	kfree_const(gdev->label);
 	kfree(gdev->descs);
-	cleanup_srcu_struct(&gdev->srcu);
 	kfree(gdev);
 }
 
@@ -1076,14 +1073,9 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 		goto err_free_gdev;
 	gdev->id = ret;
 
-	ret = init_srcu_struct(&gdev->srcu);
-	if (ret)
-		goto err_free_ida;
-	rcu_assign_pointer(gdev->chip, gc);
-
 	ret = init_srcu_struct(&gdev->desc_srcu);
 	if (ret)
-		goto err_cleanup_gdev_srcu;
+		goto err_free_ida;
 
 	ret = dev_set_name(&gdev->dev, GPIOCHIP_NAME "%d", gdev->id);
 	if (ret)
@@ -1276,8 +1268,6 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 
 err_cleanup_desc_srcu:
 	cleanup_srcu_struct(&gdev->desc_srcu);
-err_cleanup_gdev_srcu:
-	cleanup_srcu_struct(&gdev->srcu);
 err_free_ida:
 	ida_free(&gpio_ida, gdev->id);
 err_free_gdev:
@@ -1314,8 +1304,6 @@ void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *gc)
 	synchronize_srcu(&gpio_devices_srcu);
 
 	/* Numb the device, cancelling all outstanding operations */
-	rcu_assign_pointer(gdev->chip, NULL);
-	synchronize_srcu(&gdev->srcu);
 	revocable_revoke(gdev->chip_rp);
 	gpio_device_teardown_shared(gdev);
 	gpiochip_irqchip_remove(gc);
@@ -2815,8 +2803,6 @@ static int gpiochip_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	if (WARN_ON(!gc->direction_input))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
@@ -2832,8 +2818,6 @@ static int gpiochip_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset,
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	if (WARN_ON(!gc->direction_output))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
@@ -2921,8 +2905,6 @@ static int gpiochip_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	if (WARN_ON(unlikely(!gc->set)))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
@@ -3270,8 +3252,6 @@ static int gpiochip_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	/* Make sure this is called after checking for gc->get(). */
 	ret = gc->get(gc, offset);
 	if (ret > 1)
@@ -3323,8 +3303,6 @@ static int gpiod_get_raw_value_commit(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 static int gpio_chip_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
 				  unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	if (gc->get_multiple) {
 		int ret;
 
@@ -3668,8 +3646,6 @@ static int gpiochip_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
 	unsigned int i;
 	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	if (gc->set_multiple) {
 		ret = gc->set_multiple(gc, mask, bits);
 		if (ret > 0)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
index a254a57f37f5..6a97d9726c20 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
  * @chrdev: character device for the GPIO device
  * @id: numerical ID number for the GPIO chip
  * @owner: helps prevent removal of modules exporting active GPIOs
- * @chip: pointer to the corresponding gpiochip, holding static
  * data for this device
  * @descs: array of ngpio descriptors.
  * @valid_mask: If not %NULL, holds bitmask of GPIOs which are valid to be
@@ -51,7 +50,6 @@
  *                 process context
  * @device_notifier: used to notify character device wait queues about the GPIO
  *                   device being unregistered
- * @srcu: protects the pointer to the underlying GPIO chip
  * @chip_rp: revocable provider handle for the corresponding struct gpio_chip.
  * @pin_ranges: range of pins served by the GPIO driver
  *
@@ -65,7 +63,6 @@ struct gpio_device {
 	struct cdev		chrdev;
 	int			id;
 	struct module		*owner;
-	struct gpio_chip __rcu	*chip;
 	struct gpio_desc	*descs;
 	unsigned long		*valid_mask;
 	struct srcu_struct	desc_srcu;
@@ -79,7 +76,6 @@ struct gpio_device {
 	rwlock_t		line_state_lock;
 	struct workqueue_struct	*line_state_wq;
 	struct blocking_notifier_head device_notifier;
-	struct srcu_struct	srcu;
 	struct revocable	*chip_rp;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL
-- 
2.53.0.310.g728cabbaf7-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-13  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-13  9:29 [PATCH v3 00/11] gpio: Adopt revocable mechanism for UAF prevention Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13  9:29 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] gpio: Access `gpio_bus_type` in gpiochip_setup_dev() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20  7:46   ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-13  9:29 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] gpio: Remove redundant check for struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20  7:48   ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-13  9:29 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] gpio: sysfs: " Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20  7:51   ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-23  6:17     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13  9:29 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] gpio: Ensure struct gpio_chip for gpiochip_setup_dev() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-18 10:24   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-13  9:29 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] gpio: cdev: Don't check struct gpio_chip in gpio_chrdev_open() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20  7:51   ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-13  9:29 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] selftests: gpio: Add gpio-cdev-uaf tests Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20  7:52   ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-13  9:29 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] gpio: Add revocable provider handle for struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-18 10:28   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-13  9:29 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] gpio: cdev: Leverage revocable for accessing " Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13  9:29 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] gpio: Remove gpio_chip_guard by using revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13  9:29 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] gpio: Leverage revocable for accessing struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13  9:29 ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2026-02-18 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] gpio: Adopt revocable mechanism for UAF prevention Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23  6:21   ` Tzung-Bi Shih

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260213092958.864411-12-tzungbi@kernel.org \
    --to=tzungbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=brgl@kernel.org \
    --cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox