From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>, Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, tzungbi@kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/11] gpio: Remove unused `chip` and `srcu` in struct gpio_device
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:29:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260213092958.864411-12-tzungbi@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260213092958.864411-1-tzungbi@kernel.org>
`chip` and `srcu` in struct gpio_device are unused as their usages are
replaced to use revocable. Remove them.
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
---
v3:
- No changes.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260203061059.975605-12-tzungbi@kernel.org
- No changes.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260116081036.352286-24-tzungbi@kernel.org
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 26 +-------------------------
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h | 4 ----
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 2ba78add3417..01be9f6978f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -423,8 +423,6 @@ static int gpiochip_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
{
int ret;
- lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
if (WARN_ON(!gc->get_direction))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -875,7 +873,6 @@ static void gpiodev_release(struct device *dev)
ida_free(&gpio_ida, gdev->id);
kfree_const(gdev->label);
kfree(gdev->descs);
- cleanup_srcu_struct(&gdev->srcu);
kfree(gdev);
}
@@ -1076,14 +1073,9 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
goto err_free_gdev;
gdev->id = ret;
- ret = init_srcu_struct(&gdev->srcu);
- if (ret)
- goto err_free_ida;
- rcu_assign_pointer(gdev->chip, gc);
-
ret = init_srcu_struct(&gdev->desc_srcu);
if (ret)
- goto err_cleanup_gdev_srcu;
+ goto err_free_ida;
ret = dev_set_name(&gdev->dev, GPIOCHIP_NAME "%d", gdev->id);
if (ret)
@@ -1276,8 +1268,6 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
err_cleanup_desc_srcu:
cleanup_srcu_struct(&gdev->desc_srcu);
-err_cleanup_gdev_srcu:
- cleanup_srcu_struct(&gdev->srcu);
err_free_ida:
ida_free(&gpio_ida, gdev->id);
err_free_gdev:
@@ -1314,8 +1304,6 @@ void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *gc)
synchronize_srcu(&gpio_devices_srcu);
/* Numb the device, cancelling all outstanding operations */
- rcu_assign_pointer(gdev->chip, NULL);
- synchronize_srcu(&gdev->srcu);
revocable_revoke(gdev->chip_rp);
gpio_device_teardown_shared(gdev);
gpiochip_irqchip_remove(gc);
@@ -2815,8 +2803,6 @@ static int gpiochip_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
{
int ret;
- lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
if (WARN_ON(!gc->direction_input))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -2832,8 +2818,6 @@ static int gpiochip_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset,
{
int ret;
- lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
if (WARN_ON(!gc->direction_output))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -2921,8 +2905,6 @@ static int gpiochip_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
{
int ret;
- lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
if (WARN_ON(unlikely(!gc->set)))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -3270,8 +3252,6 @@ static int gpiochip_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
{
int ret;
- lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
/* Make sure this is called after checking for gc->get(). */
ret = gc->get(gc, offset);
if (ret > 1)
@@ -3323,8 +3303,6 @@ static int gpiod_get_raw_value_commit(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
static int gpio_chip_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
{
- lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
if (gc->get_multiple) {
int ret;
@@ -3668,8 +3646,6 @@ static int gpiochip_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
unsigned int i;
int ret;
- lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
if (gc->set_multiple) {
ret = gc->set_multiple(gc, mask, bits);
if (ret > 0)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
index a254a57f37f5..6a97d9726c20 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
* @chrdev: character device for the GPIO device
* @id: numerical ID number for the GPIO chip
* @owner: helps prevent removal of modules exporting active GPIOs
- * @chip: pointer to the corresponding gpiochip, holding static
* data for this device
* @descs: array of ngpio descriptors.
* @valid_mask: If not %NULL, holds bitmask of GPIOs which are valid to be
@@ -51,7 +50,6 @@
* process context
* @device_notifier: used to notify character device wait queues about the GPIO
* device being unregistered
- * @srcu: protects the pointer to the underlying GPIO chip
* @chip_rp: revocable provider handle for the corresponding struct gpio_chip.
* @pin_ranges: range of pins served by the GPIO driver
*
@@ -65,7 +63,6 @@ struct gpio_device {
struct cdev chrdev;
int id;
struct module *owner;
- struct gpio_chip __rcu *chip;
struct gpio_desc *descs;
unsigned long *valid_mask;
struct srcu_struct desc_srcu;
@@ -79,7 +76,6 @@ struct gpio_device {
rwlock_t line_state_lock;
struct workqueue_struct *line_state_wq;
struct blocking_notifier_head device_notifier;
- struct srcu_struct srcu;
struct revocable *chip_rp;
#ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL
--
2.53.0.310.g728cabbaf7-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-13 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-13 9:29 [PATCH v3 00/11] gpio: Adopt revocable mechanism for UAF prevention Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] gpio: Access `gpio_bus_type` in gpiochip_setup_dev() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20 7:46 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] gpio: Remove redundant check for struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20 7:48 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] gpio: sysfs: " Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20 7:51 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-23 6:17 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] gpio: Ensure struct gpio_chip for gpiochip_setup_dev() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-18 10:24 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] gpio: cdev: Don't check struct gpio_chip in gpio_chrdev_open() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20 7:51 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] selftests: gpio: Add gpio-cdev-uaf tests Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-20 7:52 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] gpio: Add revocable provider handle for struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-18 10:28 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] gpio: cdev: Leverage revocable for accessing " Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] gpio: Remove gpio_chip_guard by using revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13 9:29 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] gpio: Leverage revocable for accessing struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-13 9:29 ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2026-02-18 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] gpio: Adopt revocable mechanism for UAF prevention Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 6:21 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260213092958.864411-12-tzungbi@kernel.org \
--to=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox