From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
To: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@chromium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Bhanu Prakash Maiya <bhanumaiya@chromium.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>,
Rob Barnes <robbarnes@google.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/24] platform/chrome: cros_ec: Use PM subsystem to manage wakeirq
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 14:26:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZYvDshfJ-jnWNEY5@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231226122113.v3.24.Ieee574a0e94fbaae01fd6883ffe2ceeb98d7df28@changeid>
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 12:21:28PM -0700, Mark Hasemeyer wrote:
> The cros ec driver is manually managing the wake IRQ by calling
> enable_irq_wake()/disable_irq_wake() during suspend/resume.
>
> Modify the driver to use the power management subsystem to manage the
> wakeirq.
>
> Rather than assuming that the IRQ is wake capable, use the underlying
> firmware/device tree to determine whether or not to enable it as a wake
> source. Some Chromebooks rely solely on the ec_sync pin to wake the AP
> but do not specify the interrupt as wake capable in the ACPI _CRS. For
> LPC/ACPI based systems a DMI quirk is introduced listing boards whose
> firmware should not be trusted to provide correct wake capable values.
> For device tree base systems, it is not an issue as the relevant device
> tree entries have been updated and DTS is built from source for each
> ChromeOS update.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@chromium.org>
The patch overall looks good to me.
With some minor comments:
Acked-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_uart.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_uart.c
[...]
> static int cros_ec_uart_acpi_probe(struct cros_ec_uart *ec_uart)
> {
[...]
> /* Retrieve GpioInt and translate it to Linux IRQ number */
> - ret = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(adev, 0);
> + ret = acpi_dev_get_gpio_irq_resource(adev, NULL, 0, &irqres);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> - ec_uart->irq = ret;
> - dev_dbg(&ec_uart->serdev->dev, "IRQ number %d\n", ec_uart->irq);
> + ec_uart->irq = irqres.start;
How about keep using `ret`?
> @@ -301,7 +306,14 @@ static int cros_ec_uart_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev)
>
> serdev_device_set_client_ops(serdev, &cros_ec_uart_client_ops);
>
> - return cros_ec_register(ec_dev);
> + /* Register a new cros_ec device */
> + ret = cros_ec_register(ec_dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't register ec_dev (%d)\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
It doesn't need the change after moving device_init_wakeup() and
dev_pm_set_wake_irq() into cros_ec_register().
Drop it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-27 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-26 19:21 [PATCH v3 00/24] Improve IRQ wake capability reporting and update the cros_ec driver to use it Mark Hasemeyer
2023-12-26 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 24/24] platform/chrome: cros_ec: Use PM subsystem to manage wakeirq Mark Hasemeyer
2023-12-27 6:26 ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2023-12-27 20:45 ` Mark Hasemeyer
2023-12-27 17:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-27 21:29 ` Mark Hasemeyer
2023-12-28 2:18 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2024-02-14 17:57 ` (subset) [PATCH v3 00/24] Improve IRQ wake capability reporting and update the cros_ec driver to use it Bjorn Andersson
2024-02-16 11:31 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZYvDshfJ-jnWNEY5@google.com \
--to=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bhanumaiya@chromium.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markhas@chromium.org \
--cc=pmalani@chromium.org \
--cc=robbarnes@google.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rrangel@chromium.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox