From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh8-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.159]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 460D8224CF for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.159 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709560967; cv=none; b=Mun8DLWbNOp/0LEhOdmjuTnDrvqFgeTlbkl4Q8rHMZZtZnZDwQYeTyJ6WpIWKVJsrYdQbjmPiBqCb7zxVv1KdtsbYvmUtCaEe4pdbOP7lJFPZ7n2K1fNnw9A0XK9ilO6f2JgIc6xZpcuCD5Ankk/GTXifZIQzWkYfPghPaIGZOQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709560967; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oW3W6ISMlJ8Eg/hIHK1jMTGlAIWDK7R9bRS0g0+jPHo=; h=MIME-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Content-Type; b=eoIV8yad0kMCSC0T5Vc7MSTemxdIA5jG+auaxARaKZ5hQVeUnhFslW6EzSYQuGlSKUcaWqC0ouazw0yexZPsml0jF40JOLDKLUArIuuDUhDAMQO0xfWclDnd8unJSVrkewesR1FNzvvtfgtaGIelr9/wsDlupYDtv2hzv5s5Ui8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b=QGmT4hxL; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=fu/R4XyE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.159 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b="QGmT4hxL"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="fu/R4XyE" Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501D311400D5; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:02:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:02:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1709560965; x=1709647365; bh=Tyc3a0qlsGocDX90h5xGZM+hiCwDa28icbfjEtQ1zvk=; b= QGmT4hxLNmXGRO4v8IvjfEmWtXchgSMU24haZAHL4NW4DDDMnfs8r+EyLQzXryfo vX435XzUZWRrzWY+Gs1nqemCgJZDw0+xWhpxgAZDJZwaSDjmJyxoNgtO3fo0p10X bPexUBHqFSEl8QL+wBysexQN6gN6vpoIlenx2XSyq7Ilv8ZhcO7yEQ43bVvHzilv 0atKdtofMbe8qwL+83Wyx/Z6KvcBdcKv7ojY7YNk8fBnFZngoGM8KNRRj0+fVzyd Fd2WQfIQs1S9OWOUPVGQLPfmoIpSLWm6UzubajS7F5iRgNHqrRw50Q9kxMoLCYZm 4fXaZ6/JotwSFacA/5jGAg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1709560965; x= 1709647365; bh=Tyc3a0qlsGocDX90h5xGZM+hiCwDa28icbfjEtQ1zvk=; b=f u/R4XyE+vPN6RibXUKog+0xaHcTYuBNIdnDDkFXGO0/FunwE8VWyEpoMTF9L/5Nq rlPmCRO5XLYgPbKv+5l7gbxnsZ0yxNLnNi5+oRcPp9mkuU6X+NXtHT+09Ox1NJ0r 5SlJohgOr80SI/6xbRLNy7MgluqY7v3BFcd8X8xPEoMDTzTdBqjEXbPnEzr2Ypy9 4t8gCtlcVsPMFMBAqBWxCeigDDCOxHrs/9HZ584RvkJmHFiRRntQ23eBL7BJefqC wAzsp1nQ2pseaRQrIE2t9+JfW7iFJnXGj2lgUsdkSodgWVaZ1+c2BRPWclZZhsO7 undGJVuOVjeDDvX2jcmiA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrheejgdehkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedftehr nhguuceuvghrghhmrghnnhdfuceorghrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepgeefjeehvdelvdffieejieejiedvvdfhleeivdelveehjeelteegudektdfg jeevnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprg hrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id BB003B6008D; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:02:42 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-205-g4dbcac4545-fm-20240301.001-g4dbcac45 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <36df8535-083f-4ce3-84c7-b8f652a9085b@notapiano> References: <20240212-coreboot-mod-defconfig-v4-0-d14172676f6d@collabora.com> <36df8535-083f-4ce3-84c7-b8f652a9085b@notapiano> Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:02:21 +0100 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: =?UTF-8?Q?N=C3=ADcolas_F=2E_R=2E_A=2E_Prado?= Cc: "Brian Norris" , "Julius Werner" , "Masahiro Yamada" , "Nathan Chancellor" , "Nicolas Schier" , "Catalin Marinas" , "Will Deacon" , "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" , "Andy Shevchenko" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , kernel@collabora.com, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Tzung-Bi Shih" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Allow coreboot modules to autoload and enable cbmem in the arm64 defconfig Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 14:56, N=C3=ADcolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 09:50:04AM -0500, N=C3=ADcolas F. R. A. Prado = wrote: >> N=C3=ADcolas F. R. A. Prado (4): >> firmware: coreboot: Generate modalias uevent for devices >> firmware: coreboot: Generate aliases for coreboot modules >> firmware: coreboot: Replace tag with id table in driver struct >> arm64: defconfig: Enable support for cbmem entries in the coreb= oot table > > is it ok for Tzung-Bi to merge this last patch for the defconfig throu= gh the > chrome-platform-firmware tree? I would much prefer to see this patch get sent to soc@kernel.org so I can pick it up through the soc tree. I'm usually not worried about bisection issues with defconfig changes since most users have their own .config anyway, and in this case I don't see any strict dependency and would just merge the patch directly. Arnd