From: ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk (Ben Hutchings)
To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org
Subject: [cip-dev] [ANNOUNCE] Linux 4.4.15-cip15-rt10
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 21:05:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515531937.12097.1.camel@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180108105621.osnfazlumesxkwv3@linutronix.de>
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 11:56 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-01-08 11:13:12 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian,
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> > On 01/08/2018 10:33 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > On 2018-01-02 12:56:11 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > > > The release is based on the Linux 4.4.75-rt88 version. That is I
> > > > applied the -rt88 patch on the 4.4.75-cip6 kernel and merged in all
> > > > CIP releases.
> > >
> > > what is cip6?
> >
> > CIP stands for Civil Infrastructure Platform [1]. Ben Hutchings maintains
> > the 4.4.x-cip kernel tree which is a super long stable tree [2].
>
> So 4.4.x is maintained until Feb, 2022. I assumed that `cip' will take
> over / help Greg with the v4.4 tree and won't include its "own" things.
The 4.4-cip branch is not a regular stable branch. It includes some
backported hardware enablement and other minor features that aren't
suitable for stable. I am helping with review for 4.4-stable and
regularly merge it into 4.4-cip, but it's *not* planned for CIP to take
over maintenance of stable branches. After EOL for 4.4-stable, 4.4-cip
will get fixes for only the kernel components that CIP members use.
> > > > ? https://ci-rt.linutronix.de/RT-Test/kbuild.jsp?id=112
> > > >
> > > > Some of the builds are failing (allmodconfig), though it
> > > > doesn't look cip-rt specific, eg:
> > > >
> > > > > > > > ????kernel/utilities/compiletest-runner at 2/build/../include/linux/compiler.h:484 call to ?__compiletime_assert_150? declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: hw_flag_names[NUM_IEEE80211_HW_FLAGS] != (void *)0x1
> > > >
> > > > Not sure how to handle those. IIRC, we don't support allmodconfig.
> > >
> > > yes but adding
> > > ? 68920c973254 ("net/mac80211/debugfs.c: prevent build failure with
> > > ? CONFIG_UBSAN=y")
> > >
> > > could solve the issue.
> >
> > Okay, I just don't know if Ben wants to add the patch to his tree though.
>
> If the patch solves the issue then please forward the patch upstream.
> The "normal" v4.4 stable tree is affected by this, too.
4.4-stable doesn't have UBSAN. Are some other configurations (or
compiler versions) where this code fails to build? (I'm a bit
surprised that it ever compiled!)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Software Developer, Codethink Ltd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-09 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-02 11:56 [cip-dev] [ANNOUNCE] Linux 4.4.15-cip15-rt10 Daniel Wagner
2018-01-02 12:29 ` Daniel Wagner
2018-01-08 9:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-01-08 10:13 ` Daniel Wagner
2018-01-08 10:56 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-01-08 11:45 ` Daniel Wagner
2018-01-08 14:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-01-08 14:56 ` Agustín Benito Bethencourt
2018-01-09 21:05 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2018-01-09 21:31 ` Hindman, Gavin
2018-01-10 17:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-01-11 8:07 ` Daniel Wagner
2018-01-11 16:51 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-01-17 9:18 ` Daniel Wagner
2018-01-10 9:04 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1515531937.12097.1.camel@codethink.co.uk \
--to=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox