[cip-dev] [PATCH 09/15] serial: sh-sci: Add pin initialization for SCIFA/SCIFB

[ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk (Ben Hutchings)]

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 14:33 +0000, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> > Subject: Re: [cip-dev][PATCH 09/15] serial: sh-sci: Add pin initialization for SCIFA/SCIFB
> > 
> > [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at
> > http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]
> > 
> > On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 11:02 +0000, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> > > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > > 
> > > Before, the driver relied on initialization by the boot loader, or by
> > > implicit reset state.
> > > 
> > > Note that unlike on (H)SCIF, the RTS/CTS bits exist only if dedicated
> > > RTS/CTS pins are available, which depends on the SoC and UART instance.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > (cherry picked from commit e9d7a45a039913497a57887d85f5decfda4679f0)
> > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > Shouldn't we also take:
> > 
> > 5f76895e4c71 serial: sh-sci: Fix late enablement of AUTORTS
> > cfa6eb239154 serial: sh-sci: Fix (AUTO)RTS in sci_init_pins()
> 
> I had a quick look at those patches before submitting the series, and it looks
> like the second patch comes with a little bit of baggage (more backporting),
> and I wasn't sure where to draw the line.
> If you feel like those fixes are necessary I'll backport them, just let me know.

I'll accept your decision; I just wanted to make sure you didn't
accidentally leave them out.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Software Developer, Codethink Ltd.