From: ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk (Ben Hutchings)
To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org
Subject: [cip-dev] [cip-kernel-sec] report_affected: report cip branches
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 21:03:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1561061034.21054.53.camel@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1561060306.21054.51.camel@codethink.co.uk>
On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 20:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 15:13 +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
> > Allow reporting on cip branches, instead of returning an
> > error like this one:
>
> [...]
> > ?def get_stable_branch(branch_name):
> > -????match = _STABLE_BRANCH_RE.match(branch_name)
> > -????return match and get_base_ver_stable_branch(match.group(1))
> > +????if 'cip' in branch_name:
> > +????????match = _CIP_BRANCH_RE.match(branch_name)
> > +????????return match and get_base_ver_cip_branch(match.group(1))
> > +????else:
> > +????????match = _STABLE_BRANCH_RE.match(branch_name)
> > +????????return match and get_base_ver_stable_branch(match.group(1))
>
> [...]
>
> Does this function actually need to know anything about specific branch
> names???It seems like we should be able to implement it as something
> like:
>
> ????for branch in?get_live_branches():
> ????????if branch['short_name'] == branch_name:
> ????????????return branch
> ????return None
In fact it would probably make more sense to get rid of this function
altogether and put that code in reported_affected.py, which can avoid
calling get_live_branches() multiple times.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Software Developer ? Codethink Ltd
https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street
Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-20 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-20 6:13 [cip-dev] [cip-kernel-sec] report_affected: report cip branches Daniel Sangorrin
2019-06-20 19:51 ` Ben Hutchings
2019-06-20 20:03 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1561061034.21054.53.camel@codethink.co.uk \
--to=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox