From: pavel@denx.de (Pavel Machek)
To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org
Subject: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y V2] net: ipconfig: Support using "delayed" DHCP replies
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 23:19:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190502211929.GA19728@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1556198897-5710-2-git-send-email-patryk.mungai-ndungu.kx@renesas.com>
Hi!
> The dhcp code only waits 1s between sending DHCP requests on different
> devices and only accepts an answer for the device that sent out the last
> request. Only the timeout at the end of a loop is increased iteratively
> which favours only the last device. This makes it impossible to work
> with a dhcp server that takes little more than 1s connected to a device
> that is not the last one.
>
> Instead of also increasing the inter-device timeout, teach the code to
> handle delayed replies.
>
> To accomplish that, make *ic_dev track the current ic_device instead of
> the current net_device and adapt all users accordingly. The relevant
> change then is to reset d to ic_dev on a reply to assert that the
> followup request goes through the right device.
Thanks!
In the end I decided to apply this one. It is true that the alternate
fix is one-liner, but I would not be sure if other timing parameters
need changing, and would not have a good way to test that.
Best regards,
Pavel
> --- a/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@
> /* Define the timeout for waiting for a DHCP/BOOTP/RARP reply */
> #define CONF_OPEN_RETRIES 2 /* (Re)open devices twice */
> #define CONF_SEND_RETRIES 6 /* Send six requests per open */
> -#define CONF_INTER_TIMEOUT (HZ) /* Inter-device timeout: 1 second */
> #define CONF_BASE_TIMEOUT (HZ*2) /* Initial timeout: 2 seconds */
> #define CONF_TIMEOUT_RANDOM (HZ) /* Maximum amount of randomization */
> #define CONF_TIMEOUT_MULT *7/4 /* Rate of timeout growth */
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/attachments/20190502/acebc038/attachment.sig>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-02 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-25 13:28 [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y V2] DHCP client support when receiving "delayed" replies Patryk Mungai
2019-04-25 13:28 ` [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y V2] net: ipconfig: Support using "delayed" DHCP replies Patryk Mungai
2019-05-02 21:19 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190502211929.GA19728@amd \
--to=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox