From: pavel@denx.de (Pavel Machek)
To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org
Subject: [cip-dev] Regarding backporting RTC PCF85263 driver to cip 4.4 kernel
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 23:46:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190714214606.GA19428@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OSBPR01MB210389D3E16B7A69C24ADF0EB8F20@OSBPR01MB2103.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Hi!
>
> RTC PCF85263 is used by iWave RZ/G1C SBC( iwg23s) platform. We have upstreamed this driver support on 4.19 kernel [1]
> [1]. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c?h=v5.2&id=fc979933bcf162595b6004d0de4effb64c323152
>
> This driver is based on RTC PCF 85363 driver which has rtc nvmem/alarm support [2] . Rtc nvmem framework is introduced in 4.13
> [2]. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c?h=v5.2&id=a9687aa2764dd2669602bd19dc636cbeef5293d5
>
> We are seeing the following options for backporting this driver to
> 4.4 kernel
First, you did a lot of work there...
> Option 1:
> Backport this driver[1] to 4.4 kernel along with nvmem/alarm support. we have already done this work and patches are available at [3]
> [3]. https://gitlab.com/bijud/pcf85263/tree/master
Ok, this is rather long/big series, and some parts are quite scary:
https://gitlab.com/bijud/pcf85263/blob/master/0013-rtc-nvmem-allow-registering-the-nvmem-device-before-.patch
> Option 2:
> Backport RTC PCF85263 driver, removing Alarm/nvmem functionality
> from [2] .
So we basically get this one, and few patches on top, local to the new files.
https://gitlab.com/bijud/pcf85263/blob/master/0015-rtc-add-support-for-NXP-PCF85363-real-time-clock.patch
I think I prefer option 2.
> Option 3:
> Don't backport RTC support at all.
Applying patch #15 is easy. We can do option 2 I believe.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/attachments/20190714/47a6b486/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-14 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-12 11:28 [cip-dev] Regarding backporting RTC PCF85263 driver to cip 4.4 kernel Biju Das
2019-07-14 21:46 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2019-07-14 22:48 ` nobuhiro1.iwamatsu at toshiba.co.jp
2019-07-15 6:45 ` Biju Das
2019-07-15 6:43 ` Biju Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190714214606.GA19428@amd \
--to=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox