From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pavel@denx.de (Pavel Machek) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:12:21 +0200 Subject: [cip-dev] [PATCH/RFC 4.19.y-cip 00/41] Fast forward sh-pfc In-Reply-To: <1566991328-25476-1-git-send-email-fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> References: <1566991328-25476-1-git-send-email-fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> Message-ID: <20190829081221.GD10041@amd> To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org List-Id: cip-dev.lists.cip-project.org Hi! > they have made good progress upstream with the development of sh-pfc, > and although the functionality of the drivers hasn't changed much, > the code looks fairly different. This means that backporting patches > to SoC specific driver files will be increasingly hard and error > prone, unless we fast-forward the code base for 4.19.y-cip, hence > this series. > What do you gus think? Comments welcome! I reviewed the patches... and it is interesting how much magic can be done with preprocessor. I do not see anything preventing the merge, but they were marked [rfc] so I'm not doing that yet. Let me know if I should. Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: