[cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y-cip 03/17] mmc: renesas-sdhi: rename sh_mobile_sdhi.c => renesas_sdhi_core.c

[pavel@denx.de (Pavel Machek)]

Hi!

> Looks like to avoid confusion, We need to backport  the patch
> 13bbd8af65895c524c27850495fadf23449f9f3d (mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: don't use array for DT configs)
> 685d29ef1783af0049c4aeeec43722e410d5845d (mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: enable SDIO IRQs for RCar Gen3)
> 2272c841ee301402ea7a01fc727619af1f97f0cc (mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: simplify code for voltage switching)
> What do you think?

Yes, that sounds like reasonable way forward.

> > @@ -511,13 +505,14 @@ static int sh_mobile_sdhi_write16_hook(struct
> > ...
> >         case CTL_DMA_ENABLE:
> >  -               return sh_mobile_sdhi_wait_idle(host);
> > +       case EXT_ACC:
> > +               return renesas_sdhi_wait_idle(host)
> >         }
> > 
> > (Additional case handled in a switch).
> 
> Looks like to avoid confusion, We need to backport  the patch
> 13bbd8af65895c524c27850495fadf23449f9f3d (mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: don't use array for DT configs)
> What do you think?

I looked up 13bbd8af65895c524c27850495fadf23449f9f3d, and it does not
contain this piece. But yes, backporting patch containing that change
will do the trick.

Thanks a lot,
								Pavel

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/attachments/20191126/efaabbe1/attachment.sig>