From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pavel@denx.de (Pavel Machek) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:47:58 +0100 Subject: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y-cip 03/17] mmc: renesas-sdhi: rename sh_mobile_sdhi.c => renesas_sdhi_core.c In-Reply-To: References: <1574341247-46652-1-git-send-email-biju.das@bp.renesas.com> <1574341247-46652-4-git-send-email-biju.das@bp.renesas.com> <20191122100917.GD30479@amd> Message-ID: <20191126174758.GA30387@duo.ucw.cz> To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org List-Id: cip-dev.lists.cip-project.org Hi! > Looks like to avoid confusion, We need to backport the patch > 13bbd8af65895c524c27850495fadf23449f9f3d (mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: don't use array for DT configs) > 685d29ef1783af0049c4aeeec43722e410d5845d (mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: enable SDIO IRQs for RCar Gen3) > 2272c841ee301402ea7a01fc727619af1f97f0cc (mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: simplify code for voltage switching) > What do you think? Yes, that sounds like reasonable way forward. > > @@ -511,13 +505,14 @@ static int sh_mobile_sdhi_write16_hook(struct > > ... > > case CTL_DMA_ENABLE: > > - return sh_mobile_sdhi_wait_idle(host); > > + case EXT_ACC: > > + return renesas_sdhi_wait_idle(host) > > } > > > > (Additional case handled in a switch). > > Looks like to avoid confusion, We need to backport the patch > 13bbd8af65895c524c27850495fadf23449f9f3d (mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: don't use array for DT configs) > What do you think? I looked up 13bbd8af65895c524c27850495fadf23449f9f3d, and it does not contain this piece. But yes, backporting patch containing that change will do the trick. Thanks a lot, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: not available URL: