Re: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y-cip 00/11] ti-cpufreq backport

Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2020-09-09T20:12:09Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1542 bytes --]

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@denx.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 4:04 PM
> To: Chen-Yu Tsai (Moxa) <wens@csie.org>
> Cc: iwamatsu nobuhiro(岩松 信洋 □ＳＷＣ◯ＡＣＴ) <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>; pavel@denx.de;
> cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org; JohnsonCH.Chen@moxa.com; victor.yu@moxa.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4.y-cip 00/11] ti-cpufreq backport
>
> Hi!
>
> > This is the final part of MOXA's PM / OPP / ti-cpufreq backport series.
> > Part 2, which consisted of OPP / cpufreq-dt cleanups, is abandoned in
> > favor of directly backporting the ti-cpufreq driver.
> >
> > This part includes a couple of patches to the PM / OPP subsystem to
> > expose required APIs, and deal with the v1/v2 mixed OPP table used
> > by am33xx. The rest are the backport of the ti-cpufreq driver, and
> > fixes for this driver. The fixes were requested by CIP kernel
> > maintainers as part of MOXA's previous attempt to backport ti-cpufreq.
> > They are included as separate patches, as there are quite a few of them
> > spread over multiple kernel releases.
> >
> > The result is that my BeagleBone Black can run at higher speeds than
> > without the ti-cpufreq driver due to having a better silicon
> > revision.
>
> The series looks good to me. I can apply it if it passes testing and
> there are no other comments.

This patch series looks good to me too.
So, I applied and pushed.

>
> Best regards,
> Pavel

Best regards,
Nobuhiro

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 419 bytes --]

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#5438): https://lists.cip-project.org/g/cip-dev/message/5438
Mute This Topic: https://lists.cip-project.org/mt/76726426/4520388