From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E977C433F5 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 20:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [46.255.230.98]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.2047.1647463694158159211 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 13:48:15 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=neutral (domain: denx.de, ip: 46.255.230.98, mailfrom: pavel@denx.de) Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id ABE5C1C0BB0; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 21:48:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 21:48:09 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org Cc: jan.kiszka@siemens.com Subject: Re: [cip-dev] Starting 4.4 backports Message-ID: <20220316204809.GA23976@duo.ucw.cz> References: <16DCA3473A223E6A.28363@lists.cip-project.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16DCA3473A223E6A.28363@lists.cip-project.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 20:48:16 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.cip-project.org/g/cip-dev/message/7757 --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > So... I have some scripts, and I went through 4.9.299... I guess I > could try to update linux-4.4.y tree with patches from 4.9.299. >=20 > I would not mind someone looking at notes I've made so far. They are > at: >=20 > https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/lts-commit-list/-/blob/master/v= 4.4.org >=20 > There are some notes at begining of file explaining what different > values of the first field are. Most important now is number -- it > means that the patch looks "not worth the effort dealing with", and I > plan to simply ignore it. >=20 > Comments? Is it okay to go ahead? I have merged 4.9.299 changes with -cip, and result is at https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/tree/ci/pavel/linux-test =2E If there are no other comments, I'll push that as linux-4.4.y-cip on kernel.org and I'll push the tree with just the changes from stable as linux-4.4.y-st there, too. I guess at some point we'll need to decide how to mark versions in the linux-4.4.y-st tree. I guess we could use "-stX" as an extra version. If we wait a bit, we can use X=3DY-300 for corresponding 4.9.Y version. Best regards, Pavel --=20 DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCYjJNCQAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8jH2AJ4/yGgCTyZMZPcn7fcNKRzjig8t/ACaAjrN9vLktAm7NCa2HArnQebfm8I= =fWTF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft--