From: Tobias Schaffner <tobias.schaffner@siemens.com>
To: pavel@nabladev.com
Cc: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org,
nobuhiro.iwamatsu.x90@mail.toshiba,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Jan Altenberg <jan.altenberg@osadl.org>
Subject: Re: [cip-dev] preempt_rt on BeagleV-Fire
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 12:08:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f854acc-e08e-4405-b9fb-dfb71015a75f@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aWDRYgwxThmOyGPr@duo.ucw.cz>
Hi Pavel,
On 1/9/26 10:58, Pavel Machek via lists.cip-project.org wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> has anyone already tested preempt_rt on the BeagleV-Fire?
>>
>> OSADL has evaluated preempt_rt on both the PolarFire Icicle Kit
>> (MPFS250T) and the PolarFire Discovery Kit (MPFS095T) and has reported
>> rather problematic latency results so far[1].
>>
>> Since the BeagleV-Fire is also based on a PolarFire SoC (MPFS025T), I
>> suspect we might run into similar issues. Any experiences, measurements,
>> or insights would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Those OSADL results actually look good to me :-).
>
> Ok, so let me explain. BeagleV-Fire seems to have slow CPUs. Like
> "Nokia N900" slow. That's TI OMAP 3430 SoC, 600 MHz ARM Cortex-A8 CPU
> from 2010 or so.
>
> It is certainly less than 10% of speed of Core i9-9900K, and that one
> reaches 100usec...
>
> https://www.osadl.org/Latency-plot-of-system-in-rack-0-slot.qa-latencyplot-r0s5.0.html?latencies=&showno=&shadow=1&slider=360
>
> ...so 350usec is actually not that bad, AFAICT.
I cannot see any CPU isolation in the profile data for the Core
i9-9900K. Maybe they are using cgroups here, and this is not visible.
Comparing the isolated cores of the VisionFive2 @ 1500 MHz [1] to the
MPFS250T @ 600 MHz [2], it is more like 45 µs to 250 µs.
Your point is still valid. The gap may not be as large as it looks at
first glance, but I don’t think the difference in frequency explains it
completely.
Best,
Tobias
[1]
https://www.osadl.org/Latency-plot-of-system-in-rack-3-slot.qa-latencyplot-r3s2.0.html?shadow=1
[2]
https://www.osadl.org/Latency-plot-of-system-in-rack-7-slot.qa-latencyplot-r7s2.0.html?shadow=1
> Not sure what our requirements are, sometimes people put the
> time-critical stuff into FPGA.
>
> Best regards,
> Pavel
>
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#21493): https://lists.cip-project.org/g/cip-dev/message/21493
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.cip-project.org/mt/117149606/7247900
> Group Owner: cip-dev+owner@lists.cip-project.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.cip-project.org/g/cip-dev/unsub [tobias.schaffner@siemens.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-09 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-08 8:53 preempt_rt on BeagleV-Fire Tobias Schaffner
2026-01-09 9:58 ` [cip-dev] " Pavel Machek
2026-01-09 11:08 ` Tobias Schaffner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f854acc-e08e-4405-b9fb-dfb71015a75f@siemens.com \
--to=tobias.schaffner@siemens.com \
--cc=cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org \
--cc=jan.altenberg@osadl.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=nobuhiro.iwamatsu.x90@mail.toshiba \
--cc=pavel@nabladev.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox