From: agustin.benito@codethink.co.uk (Agustín Benito Bethencourt)
To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org
Subject: [cip-dev] Reviewing 4.4 stable updates
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 09:44:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4164408.1bE63kujAu@linux-if6s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000501d3ec18$26ef17d0$74cd4770$@toshiba.co.jp>
Hi Daniel,
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 08:44:19 CEST Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
> It seems that backporting "fanotify: Release SRCU lock when waiting for
> userspace response" was too complicated:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2017/06/msg00170.html
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org
> > [mailto:cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org] On Behalf Of Daniel
> > Sangorrin Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 1:07 PM
> > To: 'Ben Hutchings' <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>;
> > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] Reviewing 4.4 stable updates
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org
> > > [mailto:cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org] On Behalf Of Daniel
> > > Sangorrin Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 8:53 AM
> > > To: 'Ben Hutchings' <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>;
> > > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] Reviewing 4.4 stable updates
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > I saw there is already a 4.4.129 on the linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y.
> > > Test results so far show no regressions (altough i see failures that
> > > might need investigation?):
> > > Pixel: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/22/732
> > > Linaro: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/23/116
> > > Kerneltests: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/23/823
> > > dmseg: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/23/1028
> > >
> > > I will run some tests with Fuego.
> >
> > Sorry for the late response. I tested LTS 4.4.129 with Fuego and most
> > tests worked correctly.
> > There were a few errors on some of the LTP tests (see the file attached).
> >
> > fcntl35.c:98: FAIL: an unprivileged user init the capacity of a pipe to
> > 65536 unexpectedly, expected 4096
> > getxattr04.c:72: FAIL: getxattr() failed to get an existing attribute
> > inotify07.c:157: FAIL: didn't get event: mask=40000004
> > inotify08.c:150: FAIL: didn't get event: mask=4
> > [Note] These 4 errors could be related with some configuration, so I need
> > to investigate them further.
> >
> > For fanotify07 and fanotify08 I got some timeout errors:
> > tst_test.c:1015: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Cannot kill test processes!
> > Congratulation, likely test hit a kernel bug.
> > Exitting uncleanly...
> >
> > Dhinakar Kalyanasundaram mentioned that this bug was fixed in kernel 4.14,
> > and Tim Bird updated the Fuego LTP documentation suggesting that
> > backporting the patch "fanotify: Release SRCU lock when waiting for
> > userspace response" should fix the hang.
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9659809/
> >
> > Shall I backport it and test?
It would be of a great help.
Can you send these reports to cip-testing-results ?
Best Regards
--
Agust?n Benito Bethencourt
Principal Consultant
Codethink Ltd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-15 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 13:18 [cip-dev] Reviewing 4.4 stable updates Ben Hutchings
2018-04-25 23:52 ` Daniel Sangorrin
2018-04-26 14:30 ` Ben Hutchings
2018-05-15 4:06 ` Daniel Sangorrin
2018-05-15 6:44 ` Daniel Sangorrin
2018-05-15 7:44 ` Agustín Benito Bethencourt [this message]
2018-05-15 7:53 ` Daniel Wagner
2018-05-17 1:44 ` Daniel Sangorrin
2018-05-17 5:35 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4164408.1bE63kujAu@linux-if6s \
--to=agustin.benito@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox